In the general direction, it seems to express that people's fate is not under their control. In the film, the voice in the loudspeaker determines people's life and death. Watch and control.
In a small direction, it seems to be expressing human nature. When facing a crisis, different people's reactions are selfish, cruel, cowardly, brave, kind, and just... In the peak duel, the male protagonist is like a justice trial, raising a tape stand and smashing it at the boss. The head (that is, the picture in the poster) vaguely reflects that the director still affirms the positive aspect of human nature.
But isn't this a contradiction? It tells us that kindness and justice in human nature are still good, and finally tells us that these are actually useless. I probably understand it as - accepting such a reality, and having good thoughts in your heart can live a few more minutes.
I think if I were me, I should take action when I saw a few of them prying their arsenal. There is no right or wrong, but it must be one way and the other. The weakness of the right encourages the evil. The flame, and the person who could finally launch the ultimate move actually let go after blowing the blowtorch. The same is murder, the difference of decency is that "do not do to others what you would not do to yourself", I do not want to be killed, so I do not want to kill, but there is a saying that "if someone commits me, I will commit the crime", which has been seen If you know the trend, how can you not take action. So, I choose decency, but the decency in the play deserves a little bit. If it wasn't for the woman's key moment to pull the switch, it would have been a flash in the past. (I really thought I would grab the gun after I pulled the switch, but I didn't expect to run away)
View more about The Belko Experiment reviews
