For me, who has been educated in materialism for many years, there may be some disapproval of this drama. The role of conscious thinking seems to be exaggerated in the drama. It is mentioned in the play that when Columbus landed in the New World of America, the local indigenous Indians did not see the boat, because the boat was a completely unfamiliar thing to the indigenous people and did not exist in their cognition. In my cognition, matter determines consciousness, boats and people are both concrete existences, and when human beings recognize something new, it does not mean that they cannot see it, but such matter determines that our brain has the memory of it, but We don't know what he is, so it still exists. I feel that this passage in the play is similar to "If people believe, they don't." We usually use this sentence to explain the existence of ghosts, but how many people actually see ghosts? This mainly depends on your own thinking. I don’t think there are ghosts in the world. It’s just caused by the ignorance of our human beings. Our human knowledge is limited, and we are still exploring on the way to understand the world. Human consciousness cannot fully understand the objective world and its laws. Consciousness also cannot determine existence. Speaking of the role of thinking, I thought of a book I read recently, George Orwell's 1984, which is a dystopia. In this book, the party achieves its rule by controlling the minds of the people, everyone's mind is numb, they believe everything the party says, the party says the airplane was invented by "big brother"; that we are in constant foreign wars ; say that the bombs that fall from our heads are thrown by the enemy; say that we live in the happiest country in the world; however, except for some people who have their own thoughts and opinions, such as the hero and heroine, they dare to doubt that he I don't believe that the "big brother" invented the plane, because the plane existed before the "big brother"; the heroine even thought that there was no war at all, and the bomb that fell on her head was even thrown by the party government. In contrast, the "normal" people live in anger at the enemy, in the fear of war, and in the party's deception. They are afraid, hate, and cling to the party, believing that the party will give They bring peace and happiness, but the world they live in is a false world, a world created by ideas dominated by party propaganda. But I believe that such a world cannot last in reality. The play says "people don't believe their thoughts can change reality, so this becomes reality" . I still believe that respecting objective laws is inseparable from exerting subjective initiative, which must be based on respecting objective laws. This requires us not only to respect objective laws, act in accordance with objective laws, and seek truth from facts; but also to give full play to our subjective initiative, combining respect for objective laws with exerting our subjective initiative. Practice determines knowledge, practice is the source of knowledge, practice is the fundamental driving force for the development of knowledge, practice is the ultimate goal of knowledge, and practice is the only criterion for testing the correctness of knowledge; knowledge has a negative effect on practice, and correct knowledge and scientific theory are Practice has a guiding role, and wrong understanding and unscientific theory can hinder practice. We should not separate thinking and existence (matter and consciousness), they are connected, I think, we should give full play to the subjective initiative of consciousness and practice under the guidance of correct consciousness. Just like the "inspirational" segment in the play, finally overcome the bad consciousness in the past and have positive thoughts, so as to guide oneself to strive for an objective and positive life, and should continue to take action for this, so as to achieve a happy and happy life.
View more about What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? reviews
