Small bugs are ignored, but in the end, I owe it to my son's choice. In the end, he chose not to join the gang because he was moved by his father? If it was so easy to move the father-son relationship, it would not have been so stiff for many years. During the process of searching for the car, he had many conflicts with his father, as well as the dispute over the driver's license check by the police after he returned from the car search. In fact, these can reflect the son's "gang life" values from the side, and the son should not be more appropriate after the father is arrested. Helpless and hopeless? Feeling that the father's "great" values are being forced onto his son? Shortly after the truck was stolen, he had already expressed his anger at his father for breaking his promise (the beat up the car thief). I feel that after the father was arrested, the scene of the son's psychological changes should be made up. It is entirely based on the dialogue between the father and son (or the part of the phone message) before he was deported. It is still a little unconvincing. This may be my fault, because the whole film is actually so strong The sense of resonance is enough to interpret the last son's choice, as if the audience is the son, so the choice is so logical, the fragile we always have a "happy ending" result.
But at the end of his father's "homecoming" always reminds people of the dialogue between him and his former partner and the dialogue with the NGO lawyer in the film. Are they happy for the son or worried about the father? Anyway, this ending is "the finishing touch".
View more about A Better Life reviews