When human nature is tested by justice, we ordinary people can only have one choice, and that is helplessness, not to mention whether the protagonist of this film is a murderer, the first eighteen years will be forgotten because of the second incident? The first time personnel were not punished? Even if it is the second time that he is the murderer, he shouldn't pay for the first time, right? I don't think he is the murderer. The very important point is where is the scene? A man had his throat cut and 11 more shots fired? Why was there no blood at the scene? Just a few drops of blood in the car? And didn't find any of his fingerprints? If he wears gloves, how does the blood appear in the shape of drops of blood? I began to feel that he was a likely murderer, and that the police would not frame him, but after seeing him, I felt like they couldn't do anything about him? I don't dare to say whether the police will kill him and wrong him, but it can be seen that they tried every means to convict him. It is also possible that the people in their town will frame him after they have done it. Now there is only one possibility that the day of the deceased When he appeared, he would still think that he was so lucky for the first time. Obviously, it was a fool's dream. As for what happened that day, only the deceased and the murderer might know.
View more about Making a Murderer reviews
