It's such a three-dimensional misconception!

Fanny 2022-03-28 09:01:08

I don't understand what impact the director wants to bring to society.

Ha ha, what is it that society treats bad people? They do big bad things and don't pay attention to small shining points! ?

Then all the murderers save a small animal and release it?

Artists who take drugs can continue to film

It doesn't matter if a cheating artist says he quits the show, but it doesn't matter if he says it because he has a strong sense of variety and humor?

Tiger Park’s fare evasion is because the family has to support the family, and they haven’t brought their children to play for a long time, but they are poor and want to save money. Whether it’s true or false, shooting from this angle is definitely a moving film, but in this way, fare evasion can be ignored. What? Then make a movie and tell everyone: You have legitimate reasons to evade fares! Who is the next one who evades the ticket and feeds the tiger! ? (The deceased has passed away, there is no disrespectful person or meaning to the deceased, it is just a matter of fact, I apologize for being too sharp)

The director sincerely misleads the audience, thinking that the male protagonist's son is a victim... I simply think it is to not judge a person prematurely before you know him

So good... I support this theory... But malicious misleading is not good, everything else is fine... The male protagonist's son and girlfriend said, "He has always been gentle with me and cried and always been gentle..." What does it mean? At the beginning of the movie, the lyrics of the male protagonist's son's singing are probably "How did you break up with me?" So that means that the male protagonist's son and the female vote have already broken up with the male protagonist... Then the funeral came to cry and said that he had always been right I am gentle but maliciously misled.

The male protagonist's son is anti-social... I don't care about his talent! It has nothing to do with anyone else!

Looking at the male protagonist and the male protagonist's wife, I think there is no problem with parental education

The film also deliberately emphasizes which school bully is bullying the male protagonist's son. Others ask him questions when he is recording a song. He doesn't speak with a face like "You disturbed me"... You can lock the door when you record the song... And To be honest, the university dormitory is so messy, no matter how good the microphone is, the sound quality of the recording without sound insulation is normal...

The lyrics of my son are all dark and tired lyrics such as "want to get out of here", "no one understands me", "lie", etc. But in all the movies, I can't find a reason to support the male lead. Your father is very good to you, when I was a child Teach you how to play the piano, the business is negotiated and I want to celebrate with you. I'm a cool dad! There are also women's votes, foreign universities are not losers if they have women's votes! The female ticket is pretty good~

The male protagonist finished the phone call with his son, the son looked back at his watch, and the scene of the son ended here. According to the previous article, I think the six gun killers were chosen at will... It is not the one who bullies me with sorrow and resentment, and I will kill you now. kind

So after the exclusion, only the dark, withdrawn and anti-social are left in the heart, and it has nothing to do with others!

Do you blame others for your dark heart?

On the contrary, the parents are very pitiful... The parents are very self-blame, and they have to be blamed by the society, and the female votes are also hated in various ways.

I don't understand what the director's point of view means!

I stand in the perspective of the male protagonist. It is very painful for him to lose his son. Even if he has done bad things, he is my son...

I'm on your side, I understand

But who is going to stand in the perspective of those six children?

At the end of the movie, the male protagonist sang this is my son. There are comments saying that no one criticized him and he cried. The people below are just because they have no direct relationship with them!

I think it's totally possible to create artistic contradictions with such a big mistake that the male protagonist's son is usually a bully who bullies others.

I don't understand what effect the director wants to bring to society with this film!

I have always thought that as a public matter, "advertising artists, including movies, etc." affects the public's thinking... It is not allowed to make mistakes

You told me that artists are human too

Ok, then please take the salary of ordinary people

With a high income, the social responsibility you undertake is a positive influence, which cannot be disputed. Incompatibility of language actions is a very good criterion for bad moral theory.

Movies too...I may not want to be like a melting pot...but I hope at least not bad for society.

But in the end... Moralism has always been a controversial topic, as if there is a scientist in a foreign country who is still an artist, abandoned his wife but has made extraordinary achievements in art... So how do we define this person?

View more about Rudderless reviews

Extended Reading
  • Enid 2022-03-22 09:02:36

    Curly said twice, permission to come aboard

  • Sid 2022-03-30 09:01:08

    I cried, the ballads in it are all very good, but I feel that the director did not excavate enough. In fact, there is still room for the characters to be shaped in the depths.

Rudderless quotes

  • Sam: I don't drink.

    Quick: You best check your cologne because you smell like you drink.

  • Sam: I don't know if I should be impressed by the effort or insulted that you think you can pull that off.