I'm too lazy to search. At first glance, there should be original works, and the age of popular themes should be almost in the 60s and 70s. It is strange that this book was not taken when structuralism was rampant in the 1970s. If it was shot 30 years ago, it would undoubtedly be a classic. In this day and age, I don't quite understand what it means. Of course, director, you are happy.
The performances of the actors are very good, but it sets off that Dowson is a bit out of place. Trembling is pretty good as himself. But he is not suitable for this kind of film. Whether it's body shape, looks, body language is too contemporary. In this type of film, the actor's personal style should not be too good.
I would have given this 4.5 stars 10 years ago. Now just want to give 3.5 stars. Aesthetic fatigue.
View more about High-Rise reviews
