Moriarty looks bald

Ole 2022-04-08 09:01:13

You can't accuse someone of lying, if they genuinely believe what they're saying. 1. This is just a denial of the slaughter of Jews in World War II, the Nanjing Massacre, and the issue of comfort women in World War II. It has long since risen to a political issue, where the state and the nation cannot be separated. The contradictions of reconciliation have been reconciled...and those of the civil science populist 2. The survivors of the above three incidents are almost dead, but the bad debts will continue to exist. It seems that there is an Apolloden film every few years. Yuefu's movie... 3. The heroine is a representative of sentimentality. She almost uses culture and morality to compete with science. It's actually a matter of Qianmenlouzi VS hip bones and elbows... I read the anti-TCM book a few days ago and searched it by the way. The opinions of various Internet celebrities, audio and video are also available. This is really the first topic of a brother who is against each other! Anyone who talks about this topic can claim to be a random double-blind experiment with a large sample of xxxx... Barabala, in fact, both the positive and negative sides can be regarded as orphans, or the same type of orphans ☞ As always, "knowledge panic"

View more about Denial reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ernestina 2022-04-09 09:01:08

    Maybe the law can be manipulated, but history doesn't dress up

  • Adell 2022-04-08 09:01:13

    This is actually what happened in the early 21st century, and the absurdity of human beings is always beyond imagination. The technique of the film itself is relatively normal, and the narrative efficiency is quite high.

Denial quotes

  • Richard Rampton: The coward threatens only where he is safe.

    [Quoting Goethe: "Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist"]

  • Richard Rampton: My lord, during this trial, we have heard from Professor Evans and others of at least 25 major falsifications of history. Well, says Mr. Irving, "all historians make mistakes." But there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Mr. Irving's little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Adolf Hitler. He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Mr. Irving is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor. How far, if at all, Mr. Irving's Antisemitism is the cause of his Hitler apology, or vice versa, is unimportant. Whether they are taken together or individually, it is clear that they have led him to prostitute his reputation as a serious historian in favor of a bogus rehabilitation of Adolf Hitler and the dissemination of virulent Antisemitic propaganda.