In fact, I noticed it at the beginning, but I didn't know what the story was at the time, so I didn't pay attention. Every detail, turn over to see after the end.
The first thing to notice is the animation by simon pegg. A bird was shot in the neck with an arrow and fell. (I noticed it from there. Because I like the actor Simon, so I noticed it. At first I thought it meant killing a robin.) The
meaning is very simple, Simon is dead. In the play, simon keeps talking like a twittering bird. The end result is that one arrow hits the point, and then hangs up. The previous film review said that he fell like a runaway, and Ross mentioned before that diabetes often makes it difficult to see, so it may not be dead. I think there is only one possibility for this statement, that is, the things mentioned in the play must be useful (Chekhov said that there is a gun on the wall, and a bullet must be shot before the end). But in fact, it is too far-fetched to say that Simon is not dead. Because both bullets hit the chest. He fell straight down. Either one is fatal. Throw it into the tar again, no matter whether the old man is blind or not, the probability of his escape is too low. Add this hint from the opening animation. I think it should be hung up.
Then the animation I noticed again was the butterfly, natascha mcelhohe. I am not familiar with this actor. She is the husband's wife. Butterfly implies that she has always been beautiful and pure. Finally survived, no doubt.
When you're done, go back and watch the animations of each character again. Just got a taste.
alice eve: flowers smashed by rain. Eve is acting like a young lady from some continent. She is as beautiful as a flower, and there is nothing wrong with her. In the end, he was killed by the murderer of the Russian Gang. It's normal, that murderer is not a middle-aged man with a lustful heart. It is estimated that the ending is at most two perishing.
jon polito: grave cross. The ending is dead, just a supporting role.
mimi rogers: axes. I checked this mimi, and it was the pastor's wife who was hacked to death by an axe. The strange thing is, why she and the old fbi man were added to this animation list, is it because they are more important? In the plot, the proportion of the two of them is not necessarily much more than that of the deputy police detective. Why ignore the deputy police detective?
The next step is the producer, the director and so on.
Then look at the most important male protagonist:
david shwimmer: a small house, split into a pile of ruins by lightning.
Well, before I rewatched this animation, I thought with confidence that it must be a hint of a bright life for the male protagonist to survive. When I saw this animation, I was stunned.
Many of the previous film critics and various analyses, most of them agree that the male protagonist survived in the end. It's also justified.
But the metaphor of the opening animation can't be explained.
Just watching the animation, it feels like he is saying that David has a good home, but an accident has turned into a pile of ruins.
There is a wonderful family in david. Especially when his wife said that your wife and daughter are your wealth. At this point, only those who have experienced ups and downs (and then have not succeeded) have the deepest (zi) (wo) body (an) will (wei). It's up to his wife to say that he doesn't mind that he can't make money. There's really nothing wrong with this family. Envy how many single dogs.
But to become ruins, doesn't it imply that all the good things of david have collapsed?
Feeling the director's full of malice, he made all kinds of metaphors, but he just didn't leave you with 100% evidence. The various analyses of the previous film reviews are correct. At the end of the episode where the daughter plays with the banknotes alone, at most it can guarantee that the couple will go to the doctor (or save themselves), but logically, even if they drink the poison, they may not be able to save them in time. Gotta live. Patients who take sleeping pills, smoke overdose, etc. are all as safe as dying when sent to the hospital. Does acetylcholinesterase have a decisive role? In fact, you still need to read relevant medical papers (you have to read the papers after watching a movie? You must be trying to trick me)
btw: I checked, and acute thallium poisoning should not occur in a few seconds. I remember watching the movie about the thallium poisoning case before, which mentioned that the biggest advantage of this stuff is that it is completely colorless and tasteless (the kind of clever poison that I like most in martial arts novels, it is actually very difficult to get in reality). Use colorless and tasteless stuff to trick men into drinking, and then slowly deceive the money, and then the man will slowly die. It really meets the needs of widows to commit crimes. In fact, there are not many chronic poisons, and there is no problem with using thallium salt. But it shouldn't happen any faster than cyanide. The widow didn't commit one or two crimes (the title said that she appeared earlier than the murderer), but she didn't know when this stuff happened, and it was an incomprehensible bug.
In martial arts novels, one eats a highly poisonous one, but everything is normal, and after a long time without an antidote, one will die. I don't think modern medicine can find much of such a clever poison. Usually it is either quick death or very slow. You can also control the time, unless you install a pump to control the dose. In the assassination of Kim Jong-un, it was mentioned that this drug is a tetrodotoxin or something, and I don't know if it is true.
View more about Big Nothing reviews
