The movie "Snowden" was originally a movie released in December 2015. I forgot whether it was released in China at that time. However, I still admire my behavior after watching this movie for more than two hours, just like when I used an Android phone when I watched the movie "Jobs". Sometimes I admire Americans very much. The influence of Prism Gate is huge and unprecedented, but it is the Americans themselves who made the film. The freedom of speech is indeed great and convincing. In fact, I think that the film's position is largely described from Snowden's point of view. From joining the army to the CIA, the turning point is based on Snowden's own talent for computer use, if not for his outstanding personal talent, it is also It is impossible to have access to so much information, which is also the reason why Prism Gate was shocked later, to put it bluntly. That is, I have come into contact with the core point of interest groups. From this point of view, my understanding of Snowden's personal abilities has deepened. story. Or the core question reflected by the prism door is, should people's privacy be monitored? Development is a double-edged sword. Now that digital technology and network applications are so developed, it is a problem that everyone must face. Development will inevitably bring many problems. The reason why the network has developed so rapidly is that it is widely used in life and work. When we use it ourselves, it is inevitable to spy on other people's privacy. Have you checked the content of other people's previous Moments when using WeChat? The difference is only voluntary disclosure or unauthorized viewing. Prism Gate is a large-scale indiscriminate monitoring for self-interest needs without the authorization of others, and the perpetrator is a country. For voyeurism, when the perpetrator is a state, the nature of the problem rises to unprecedented heights. It is said in the movie that this kind of behavior is no longer necessary for counter-terrorism, but for political and social control to ensure superpower status. Such monitoring, and even the government behavior derived from it, is a blatant oppression for citizens and other countries, just like installing a camera in your home, and the stored content includes bathing. In this way, the behavior itself It is unforgivable. In fact, surveillance is everywhere in life, it is only the difference between the unit and the degree. Walking on the road, cameras can be seen everywhere, restaurants, hospitals, and the surveillance of convenience stores. In fact, they are already monitoring our lives. The difference is just how much and whether it violates the bottom line of privacy. Wherever you go and who you meet every day, these surveillances are completely controllable, but people are more receptive to such surveillance. How many people and how many mobile phones are held every day is actually very simple. As long as everyone's mobile phones are monitored, what else is there to know? And the current technology can still achieve it. So, in fact, there are no secrets about privacy. In terms of whether it has monitoring value. In any case, there is no right or wrong for Snowden's actions. From the perspective of the public, it is good, and it is a fight against the dark forces, but for the US government, it is indeed a betrayal. Therefore, until now, Snowden cannot return to the United States, understandably. As for this movie, if you are interested in security issues, you can watch it and see how Americans view Snowden. If you are not interested in such biographical movies, you can skip it at all. It lasts for more than 2 hours, really Not too short.
View more about Snowden reviews
