The defense is great

After chasing it in one breath, some paragraphs have a feeling of palpitations, which is not very common. The defense completely grasped the rhythm of the incident, and grasped every point. Although they had their own tricks, they still maximized the interests of the client, while the prosecution could not even control their emotions, and there were too many places to complain. In the defense, Shapiro is good at organization and knows how to advance and retreat. Although he lost his leadership later, he has formed this team. Caring for people, such as Dutton, finally wants to turn enemies into friends.

I don't know how much this film has restored the incident. I always feel that the key evidence in the trial was not adequately defended by both the prosecution and the defense. It will make people feel that the race card has won, and it should not be that simple. From the time of the incident, the police's evidence collection has not been rigorous enough. This kind of non-rigidity is not very clear in the film. I, who have been watching Law and Order, know that if there is a problem with the collection of evidence, the judge can decide not to use it. In this play, all the evidence was accepted, but the prosecution and defense did not argue well.

Judges are weak. Of course, in this century trial, caution is necessary, but the judge's poor control over the courtroom scene allows the defense to take advantage of it. The strongest one was due to the conflict between the prosecution and the defense caused by the tapes. The prosecution was completely out of control, basically in contempt of court, but this loss of control allowed the judge to make a decision that was beneficial to the overall situation.

The jury made a decision so quickly, judging from the description of the film, it was too rash. Explain that from the outset, the prosecution made a selective error. The prosecution thinks that they have the chance to win, but in fact they lose so badly that they may not even understand where they lost? Is it possible for the defense to buy off the jury? Since there are no such rumors, there should be no such rumors. However, it is not surprising that there is a bribe based on the character of the defense and the way of doing things.

The Simpson case and the 9/11 terrorist attacks are two major events in the United States. I would like to know, after the Simpson case, what has changed in American justice?

View more about American Crime Story reviews