Choose between reason and emotion.
Reason should sacrifice a little girl and save 80 men, women and children. Perceptually believes that the child cannot be sacrificed for the task.
The government and the military have their own opinions. In a few moments, from top to bottom, the inner entanglement, choice, and everyone's point of view are constantly changing.
When ministers and officers were undecided about whether to drop missiles in the conference hall, suddenly female No. 3 (the conference hall has always opposed bombing, and finally cried the one I temporarily call female 3)
One of her points stuck in my mind: If we drop bombs now, we kill little girls, but if it's a terrorist suicide attack that kills 80 people, it's them.
In my opinion, this is a responsibility, a heart that sympathizes with a little girl, has become a person who dare not take it. In the case of exchanging 1 for 80, it is me, I can be ruthless (of course, political reasons will not be discussed here)
The heroine knew that the little girl would die, but she still carried out the mission and defied all opinions (45% of data analysis, the general's hesitation, the questioning of the drone operator) From a human point of view, she ignored the little girl life and death, but saved more families.
Looking back, our lives were not like that. There is no perfect plan, if you want to gain, you have to choose, choose to lose something. This is a topic worth thinking about. Behind a success story, there are more failure stories.
If there are too many factors that make you feel like, turn it into a simple math problem to decide!
View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
