In fact, my central idea is the last few sentences of the last paragraph, some simple discussions on cultural export; if you are not interested in watching film reviews, you can go directly to the last paragraph; about the proposition of cultural export, I actually want to discuss it. But I don't know any way to have a good discussion with people.
——20170524
In fact, objectively speaking, I was prepared to give 4 stars when I finished reading it, and I can return to a stable 3 stars after my emotions fell; I was originally prepared to score it objectively. However, when I saw the star of the same color, I was instantly enraged. Seeing those faces, I feel disgusting. How many people who have given one star have really thought about it and really have their own opinions? All in all, with the trend, a gesture of overkill. So I came up with the current 5-star play. 1-star people feel that they have rebelled against authority and are incredibly powerful and democratic; then we 5-star people can also say that we have rebelled against the ignorant people and the rabble, and there is nothing wrong with being proud. mutual encouragement.
——20170111
Update again:
There are still a few people who leave a comment and can only have enough words to start with cursing :) It is also quite funny.
All I can say is: when a person's logic is too confusing to express his point of view, and words are too lacking to argue with reason, but he can only scold someone without thinking, he really needs people from all walks of life. Love and condolences :))))
Update:
1. I have never said that the person who gave the bad review is a navy or a brainless black. I don’t know where my friend who came to refute this way saw my point of view.
2. I didn't say that you can't give bad reviews to friends, you can't feel bad, and you can't limit your freedom. But I have to express my point of view and refute the part that I think you are not objective enough, you can continue to refute my arguments one by one, instead of saying: I limit your freedom, or saying "It's mine to give a good review. Freedom, it is your freedom to give good reviews", yes, yes, there is nothing wrong with this point of view, why do you bring it up again? ? ? ? The logic is not very smooth, okay... It's like you said "Soy milk is sweet! Salty is different!" I said "No, I think salty soy milk is also quite delicious" and then you said "You can say salty It's delicious! But I also have the freedom to say sweet and delicious!"? ? Yes, I didn't say that sweet is not good at first, I just tell you, I think salty is quite delicious. The correct logical refutation is that you say, "Salty does exist, but I think how sweet is delicious, why is it delicious, I think your view that salty is delicious is wrong. Welcome to add." in this way. Then the debate can go on.
3. As for some well-organized friends who did refute and supplement my point of view, I feel very welcome, and also gave you a reply and a friendly discussion. Friends who are not logically welcome to take a look at those rebuttal points, it is a good example, which can promote friendly exchanges and discussions.
The above has been updated since 20161229
1. In fact, I was going to give 4 stars, but when I opened it, it was as I thought, one-sided bad reviews, so I couldn't help but want to give 5 stars.
2. Because it is just some personal opinions, those who disagree can be turned off directly; but I just hope to give a movie review to my friends who like this setting like me;
3. The following is the text:
Reasonable , I don't think I'm going to give a good review of nationalism to a domestic brain-opening film, but I'll watch it if I'm interested; after watching it, I think it's good if it's good, and it's bad if it's not good; I still want to give a negative score to Fengshen. If such a good theme can be made into a three-no product with no rhythm, no plot, and no character design, there is no one else;
but to be honest, the story of the Great Wall is really interesting. Ah; do you want to be so unreasonable? !
·Rhythm: I can say that there is no urine in the whole process, not slow, even very fast, I think it is a little too fast, I really want to see more brain holes and more settings, because those brain holes are too interesting Okay!
·Character design: The protagonist is outstanding, the red snake king, who has traveled thousands of miles from Dorne, ah no, he is on the scene, ahem, he is still a very interesting man; but to be honest, the characters of the two crooked kingdom characters are relatively opposite. It's fuller, and the heroine's design can be considered. So the disadvantage of a slightly faster pace is that other characters are not full enough. Of course, it is enough to highlight the primary and secondary.
·Plot: Ah, I was attracted to watch a promotional video of an old man who was promoted on Weibo that day. Everyone said it. The story is very simple and can be summed up in three sentences: Fighting monsters on the Great Wall; monsters are coming; we Won.
It's a very simple plot. It's just fighting monsters. Why do other people's filming and fighting monsters are liked, and we have all kinds of problems with our own brain holes?
good.
Here comes the problem.
First: I think this is a fantasy movie, and the setting of the creature like gluttonous food already shows that this is a fantasy movie. This is a magic film based on the Song Dynasty, and the Song Dynasty is just a setting. At this time, some people will say: You are not in line with the history of the Song Dynasty! Not in line with the Song Dynasty situation! This unscientific! I just want to say: Friends! This is a fantasy movie! Wake up you ya! It's a fantasy movie! It's annoying, why no one said that Harry Potter is not in line with modern science ah ah ah ah! I'm sick... This is a fantasy movie [capitalized and bold] [knocking on the blackboard] is for brain-opening. Then some people will say: Then why do you want to create a Song Dynasty! Then I have to say: hey, if you are reasonable, you will be scolded if you don’t let Song Dynasty go. My heart is so tired... I didn't want to talk about history with you, you have to talk about history... Why don't you talk about medieval history with The Lord of the Rings? Because people are on the other hand, right, huh, huh.
Second: I casually flipped through a few comments, and saw the opinions put forward by a few funny people. I was so tired, but I couldn't help but refute it, because I was really too smart.
a. Some people say: This military service setting is unscientific! Balabala, the blue one [I forgot what it was, it seems to be a crane] flew out to poke the gluttonous, and it had no combat power at all, so it would be better to bombard Balabala directly. Oh my dad, that blue unit is light to win, I think it's similar to the airborne soldier, it has its meaning, although it may seem useless to fly out and poke a few, but it can't go with the cannon. Compare. Why don't you say that the airborne troops are useless and don't use artillery directly? I think the settings of these arms are quite interesting, and the color of the clothes is also very eye-catching, especially where the blue girls beat the drums and give orders, it is particularly beautiful and magnificent.
b. Someone else said: The gluttonous eater is evolving, but the human being has not evolved, and the general was killed by a sneak attack. Hey, this is just the rhythm setting point. Although I think it's too fast, you can't call people unscientific because of this. Ah, isn't the change in Honneng Temple very unscientific? Is it unscientific that Takeda Shingen died of illness? Li Guang is still lost! Is it more unscientific? ? It's just an accidental factor, there are so many, it's not good to say that people are unscientific. There are always some male partners who feel that they are super proficient after reading a little history, and are about to show off, why not show off in a documentary! [Of course, when watching documentaries, there are always barrages to show off... People who want to show off have to show off everywhere, no way... sigh]
c. Another person said: gluttonous is unscientific, it is still a honeycomb setting , When the queen bee dies, she can't move. Can't you elect a new leader to continue fighting? ? I:? ? ? . This friend, this is the setting! God, why don't you say why everyone in the Lord of the Rings is confused when they get the ring man, it's not scientific; or Khaleesi can lead a dragon to hang, it's not scientific; or why Godzilla There is only one, not to fight in groups, this is unscientific! ...Even the ant in the hunter [I'm sorry I forgot my name again, and I'm too lazy to go to Baidu] doesn't just open and hang, but it evolves according to the settings. Because it's all set! If I can still give it a low score, then well, I, I can't argue with that.
I don’t remember the others for the time being, but I remember these three points very clearly, so I hereby refute them one by one.
At last.
rtyseyt yhsr
In that movie, where are the Fantastic Beasts and Where are the Fantastic Beasts, the selling feelings are directly written on the face, but some people brush it three times and four times, and the score is so high that there are no friends, at most 6.5 points, it seems to be brushed to 8 points... Not because of That is the magic written by the British.
Other people's big buses can be crushed, and brooms can fly. What's wrong with our Kongming lanterns? !
If there is no Chinese element, some people complain: there is no Chinese element! You can't do it! Negative Ratings!
With Chinese elements, someone must complain: this does not conform to historical facts! This unscientific! Negative Ratings!
Friends, can we go back to the story, back to the setting?
The setting in this Great Wall is really interesting.
last of the last.
I have a feeling I have wanted to say for a long time.
I think it makes sense that Japanese elements are popular in the world, because neon is really good at absorbing and retaining.
They can keep their core precisely while absorbing a lot of foreign elements; then, export culture!
However, we always have people who are obsessed with the minutiae, either: it is best to keep the whole thing unchanged, and a little change is to humiliate the culture; or else: the foreign culture is the best in everything, and the foreign moon is the roundest.
The two waves of people looked down on each other and did not integrate with each other; therefore, the middlemen who intended to combine Chinese and Western were scolded to death by them.
Sadly.
As a middleman, I'm going to the second brush.
Hey.
People's ghost in the shell is about to be released, but we are still arrogant. It's really boring, hey. . . .
View more about The Great Wall reviews
