Except for the so-called one-shot-to-the-end gimmick, it's basically a bad movie

Dorcas 2022-03-29 09:01:05

At the end of the film, the name of the photographer is placed in front of the director, which explains why the film was born. The one-shot shooting method is indeed quite enjoyable. The structure of the whole film is still intact even in the difficult photography and so many improvisations. It has maintained a very high degree of completion. Even though the story setting is still relatively weak, I still feel quite astonished when I see the second half. The sense of reality is great.

Juvenal 2022-04-21 09:02:50

This director is quite a chicken thief. There are a few dark places in the whole film that can be edited, but the director still has to pretend to be "one shot to the end", but I didn't realize it was one shot when I watched it. In the end, I just feel that the plot is very protracted, and many dialogues and cutscenes are unnecessary in structure and uninteresting in content. The one-shot trick is based on the premise that your plot is tight and the audience can't take their eyes off it. The film is boring, and the audience is always looking at their mobile phones or skipping numbers. What is the point of your shot? The story is very simple. The Spanish saucy girl met a few German hooligans outside the bar. After calling one of them, the gang was forced to rob them. She roamed the street alone when it was light. The story is very simple. If it weren't for the purpose of creating a scene to the end, it would have been told within half an hour, and the end of the scene also severely limited the expressiveness. A heroine who is so obedient and looking for excitement usually only exists in pornographic films. The heroine is not naked in the whole film, which is quite inconsistent. Hey, this director is really annoying. Thinking of a small idea and dreaming of becoming famous, regardless of the script, it's a piece of shit