uses violence to promote nonviolence.
A fake documentary, occupied the top spot in the Belgian box office with a production cost of 1.5W. Inevitably become a story.
The film tells the story of a killer who kills a killer from the perspective of a documentary by three producers. The plot is both depressing and absurd as well as hilarious and thought-provoking.
Why does the protagonist kill people? In order to make money, after the corpses fall one by one, they take away the property of the deceased. His killing techniques and techniques have been professionalized, and his insights into how and who to kill could be found in several books. One of the principles is to start with people with low social status, which can avoid a lot of trouble. After all, the coming and going of these people in the world will not have any major impact. In addition, the protagonist's killing methods are varied and even very skillful, which also creates a lot of fun for his killing. For example, when he enters an old man's house and finds that she has heart disease medicine, he does not use his most accustomed gun to kill, but chooses to directly intimidate her. Let her die beyond what her heart can handle, and guess where she hid money in her home, and know the analysis of human nature; after killing a black boy who works on a construction site, will see what his dick has How long, provide some use value, and praise him for being honest and not working in a nightclub; suspecting that his girlfriend might be having an affair with one of his friends, he pretended to miss him and shot him directly, and then continued to eat his birthday cake in front of everyone, as if nothing had happened Act decisively. If every time he kills people to watch separately, it will definitely make people feel very violent and anti-human, but if they are montaged together, it will feel ordinary, absurd and even funny. It is the normalization of abnormal things that makes people feel terrible. Back to the protagonist himself, he is crazy and uninhibited, but he is well versed in many things in society. He complained about the government's urban planning and layout like a factual commentator; the words that came out of his mouth before and after killing people were like a poet or a philosopher; he played a variety of instruments and had insight like an artist; , how many times the weight of different people should increase the body to not float up and analyze it like a physicist. He is a person whose understanding of all aspects of life is beyond ordinary people, but he chooses the profession of killing; or for the protagonist, killing is just a savage sideline, and enjoying life is the business. It depends on the audience's interpretation.
In the film, the film crew who was with him would interact with the protagonist, eat, talk, play games at the bar, and even join the protagonist after being numb to the murder, entering a couple's home and gang-raping the girl , and killed the couple. Life is too fragile and too ordinary, and there seems to be no essential difference between people after death. When a corpse, after being packed by the protagonist, is thrown from a cliff into the same river, they are all the same. When a person dies, it seems that only the people around the deceased feel the most, and people hardly care too much about the death of a stranger. When the protagonist and the photographer's friends and relatives were killed, they were also faced with a corpse, but they showed unprecedented sadness. The previous numbness seemed to evaporate out of thin air, and this sadness could not go away for a long time. Killing a person is not just a person's business, it will implicate the people around that person. Injustice will be repaid. In the end, the protagonist and the three other camera crews were inevitably taken out of their breath.
Of course, this is not true. This is a fake! Documentary.
Behind the fragmented and fragmented shots of the film is actually a clear vein. That is, to express the impact of violence in a violent way to promote non-violence. This is also why the protagonist of the film also suffered revenge at the end, because the plot needs, the author wants to tell us that violence is contagious and will be punished. And so is reality. In the film, the viewer is given a more intuitive visual experience of killing people for profit, which is an extreme violence. In life, we may still have many ways to hurt others, hot violence, cold violence, verbal violence, and the harm of violence will not only affect the victim himself, but also his family, his friends, and the people around him. When this violence is normalized, the perpetrator becomes insensitive. When violence becomes a common phenomenon, it loses reflection and doesn't get much attention. The law of the weak will become the unspoken rule of society. If we magnify the power of this injury, if there is a ruthless character like the protagonist in real life who is as murderous as the protagonist and who is crazy and talented, but the difference is that he is admired by the public and is at the top of the social class, then Under his instigation, violence has become the norm. What will the society look like? Only the doom that befalls us can we empathize with it, but life is too short to allow us to savor all kinds of violence one by one.
Life and death are too ordinary for this world, but they are so heavy for individuals. Please respect every individual, treat every life kindly, and reject violence.
View more about Man Bites Dog reviews
