The longest routine I've gone through is your freedom of speech.

The director is very boring and the logic is very rigorous. The director explained his point of view very well. Every time he conducts an analysis, he lists a large number of incident materials to explain it clearly. Throughout the whole article, for Bush, the director is sarcastic to analyze this character. The upset during the election campaign showed Bush's black-box operation; he learned that no effective measures were taken in the seven minutes of the 9/11 incident, showing the incompetence of Bush and the entire team; as long as there is a scene of Bush in the whole film, almost bgm is full of jokes .

Freedom of speech is right, the director explained his understanding of 9/11 and the "political achievements" during George W. Bush's administration from another angle; freedom of speech is right, but if it is shown in the form of a documentary, it is easy to ignite the suppressed emotions of the masses; speech Freedom is right. It is easier for the audience to accept the director's point of view by pairing highly objective factual proofs with highly instructive narration.

Numerous montages highlight Bush's incompetence and inaction over and over again. The director's selection of clips, paired with a playful narration, casts Bush as a hilarious clown. One of the events selected in the film left a deep impression on me. It was Vera, the mother who lost her son in the Iraq War. The director's point of view was to show that the occurrence of the war caused strong resentment among the people who supported the US government. But Vera's own views are very extreme. Before her son died, she almost blindly agreed with all the actions of the government, completely ignoring other people who were hurt by this policy. Until he suffered a loss, his attitude changed greatly, almost anti-government. I just want to say, is this really okay?

I feel a little extreme when I write these, just take a look. As far as documentaries are concerned, this is a good documentary, which closely lists the points of view, and also achieves the director's original purpose, with facts and interesting narration, very humorous. But as far as I'm concerned, documentaries only provide the director's own point of view on the basis of objective facts, present as many facts as possible, and let the audience think for themselves. Instead of taking it out of context, use only the factual basis that supports your point of view.

View more about Fahrenheit 9/11 reviews