View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
eye of the sky
Easter 2022-03-27 09:01:09
The film magnifies the ethical paradox in the war. Terrorists, as potential targets of killing, are choosing between the lives of innocent people, the interests of the politicians behind them, and the deception in their actions. Obviously, it has become another political game. But the film spends a lot of time describing whether the attack has to avoid the tug-of-war of children, and don't the lives of the surrounding civilians matter? This kind of child-first angle is nothing more than a low-level trick to win the audience's pity. Weakening the game and strengthening the rendering is an American fast food-style assembly line thinking caused by the sad shooting concept.
Extended Reading
-
Ashley 2021-12-19 08:01:08
Friends who watched it together said that it should be called the "Push Pot War".
-
Reymundo 2022-03-23 09:02:05
The director set such an extreme situation, not to promote universal values or Notre Dame cancer, he just used this to raise a question full of contradictions, and to maintain the maximum degree of objectivity, almost did not add his own position, and did not uglify the contradiction Any party, and the answer remains in each audience's own heart. Such a good movie with a compact and thought-provoking plot has been called hypocrisy. Are we watching a movie?
-
James Willett: Revolutions are fueled by postings on YouTube.
-
opening title card: "Truth is the first casualty of war." - Aeschylus