After watching the movie, I want to applaud and applaud.
This film is conducted in a dialogue between a man and a woman. It is understandable that flashbacks are a very common way, but here, "dialogue" undoubtedly has a deep meaning. The current era is an era that calls for dialogue. When "dialogue" is discovered, it is like a life-saving straw for some scholars. They may voluntarily or helplessly lie at the bottom of the deconstructed and fragmented valley, groping in the endless darkness. Until the "dialogue" flooded in light like a miracle, they seemed to have seen a new God. Although many people just throw the edges to the center to arouse people's attention and reflection, thereby facilitating dialogue, directly adopting the method of dialogue will undoubtedly have a more intuitive effect.
The two sides of the conversation are a woman and an asexual man. Note that it is an asexual man. The sexual dysfunction deprives him of his more obvious gender characteristics. This reduces the gender differences between the two parties. This arrangement makes the dialogue possible. This further contrasts the seriousness of gender inequality.
It can be said that the whole film is full of conflicts between male and female voices. She is telling, but he uses various theories to make comments. Women say that everything becomes boring when you reach you, and his noncommittal is still elated. Self-satisfaction, even if the masculine characteristics are downplayed, he is still a man. He keeps showing off the rational thinking that men are so proud of, which shows that men contempt women's intelligence.
In the final ending, she still said no, but her words no longer possess the power and can not play the role of the word itself. The woman's resistance fell silent again. At this time, she took up the gun. A gun is a weapon. It can be exchanged for power. When a woman fires a gun, she uses violence to win the right to speak.
"All the guilty and blame" is the central language. What do women want? We think of the answer to that ancient story, "Master your own destiny". I think this story still fails to give a clearer enlightenment, so that the issue of feminism has been controversial and misunderstood. The so-called feminism does not require a woman to be like a man. It’s like stepping onto the battlefield, overcoming thorns, regaining the crown, and showing strength, but "independent self-awareness". You can be a good wife and mother hidden in your boudoir, provided that this is your self-conscious choice of a lifestyle that suits you. Instead of waiting for the return of the man to warm your lonely soul. Similarly, why can't a woman's body and a man's body be equal, because in terms of physical characteristics, men's desires are stronger? Or should women be pure from an ethical point of view? Why should a woman tolerate the "all the guilty and blame" of others, including the same kind? Therefore, what women want is: equal power with men with self-awareness, self-discovery of this power, and recognition and respect for this power from the opposite sex. I agree that not only women are created, but men are also created, so both men and women should be awakened, should reflect, and then they can not mention gender but only human nature.
View more about Nymphomaniac: Vol. I reviews
