Procedural justice is always more important than substantive justice, legal persons must see, Reivew on Drishyam

8.5 points. There are three things about this awesomeness. The first is the rhythm. Unlike everyone who thinks that the process is too slow, I think the foreshadowing before the film is necessary, which is in sharp contrast with the later experience of this family, that is, although they escaped legal punishment, they also paid a heavy price, and they will bear the burden. A lifetime of guilt. Second, it is fully demonstrated that procedural justice is much more important than substantive justice. Even if it is concluded that the male protagonist and his family are lying, there is still no evidence to convict them by confession, because the evil of humiliation and conspiracy itself far exceeds the crime itself, and it is the evil of public power. Third, tricks are not the point at all, even if the tricks in Suspect X are used, but this film is not just a suspense movie, but should be valued in the discussion of reason and law. Finally, as a legal person, under the Chinese legal system, the behavior of the eldest daughter can be counted as negligent death at most. In addition, she is a minor, the other party is at fault, the situation is critical, etc., the court may rule to exempt the punishment. Entering a private house and coercing a girl into submission may be a legitimate defense, and it may not be considered a crime at all.

View more about Drishyam reviews

Drishyam pictures