. The pictures, plots, and rhythms are depressing. The culture here is so dark and helpless. The
way of expression is not clear at all, nor can it be called vague, well, it is the story telling It is not easy to understand if the next number is not correct, and the number on the upper line cannot be put on the file. That's it. It's the attitude of the big coffee, or the era that likes to burn the brain. Especially this is still a high score, and it seems that many students from the film school will analyze it. So I thought - after all, I have to wonder if I'm arrogant - Balzac's literature is great, or is it such a great work of art? Before even the slightest hesitation, my active thinking told me that there is no high or low here, there are only differences in architecture - different materials, different structures, different locations, and even different wall paints will affect the look and feel. Looking at it from the cut, maybe this is a work that is famous in film history, a work full of connotations, and it is worthy of analysis by film professionals to use it as the bottom line or zb, but for me, it is prosperous and in a trance. Give a 3 star, after all, this kind of display can't directly hit my core value.
To be honest, it's not as easy to understand as Antonio's "Zoom In". Moreover, after reading the movie review and knowing the story line, the clear picture is more cohesive and powerful. If there is something so powerful about this film, it is probably that the brain that has not been torn apart by the information age still has some dedicated thinking and spit out a work - it is really indescribable.
View more about A Short Film About Killing reviews
