There is a lot of hard knowledge about quantum physics, psychology, biology, etc. that is not enough to distinguish within the scope of my knowledge. But I also received some information that the film is constantly emphasizing the role of consciousness. But this is a very strange thing to me.
First of all, in the context of the influence of Buddhism and Taoism, I am curious about the role of consciousness, but growing up in a firm materialistic educational environment, I always have reservations about what science cannot prove. However, the premise of consciousness changing the human body and even the world is precisely that believers should not have any doubts, but must believe, be firm, concentrate, and be empty. To put it simply, it is "believe or not."
Therefore, a half-hearted person like me will never wait for the day when a miracle happens. Huang Zhizhong said during the debate that (it seems to be an issue about the concept of love) those who are in the middle are the most unhappy. I take it for granted. I don't believe that true love will die, but I also don't believe that I can meet myself. If you don't believe what scientifically proves, it's all true, and you can't rest assured that you will become an idealist. Neither believe in the success of the secular definition, but also unwilling to be indifferent and lonely in the wilderness. This is the saddest part, both clear and confused.
View more about What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? reviews
