Before the millennium, the 1999 money-losing machine was born. With the announcement, the investment of nearly 200 million yuan and the box office of 60 million yuan were really miserable. Especially, it also hurt the eternal Zorro in my heart, Antonio. · Banderas. What's the problem?
To be honest, in 1999, the currency value at that time far exceeded that of contemporary times. The box office champion "Star Wars: The Threat of the Phantom" only spent 115 million, and "The Matrix 1" spent 63 million. The former was magnificent. The action is exquisite, but in this film, the visual effects are stretched and the action is rigid and naive. Many people only see the Viking spirit that is being told, but in this respect, it is compared with Beowulf seven years later. The story structure is the same as the warrior sailing. As for the Saxon epic taste of the Queen and the powerful enemy, the effect is far worse.
Of course, there was a movie that cost more than it in 1999, that is, "The Stormtrooper", which cost 180 million. But people have the steampunk delusion western full of science fiction, including Will Smith and Kevin Klein. Salma Hayek , who is dressed up as a lady and has a charming charm , has lost money, but at any rate he has a box office of 135 million, compared with the thirteenth warrior.
What did you spend 160 million on? What else do you have?
View more about The 13th Warrior reviews
