, what do you do if science proves that your beliefs are wrong?
The monk said (presumably) that if science is indeed falsified,
I will revisit my beliefs.
But what
if science confirms the existence of God?
This film is to say such a thing.
The director should be biased towards the fact that God exists.
The scientist's lover passed away,
and a child who had the same iris as her appeared,
similar to the memory of the lover before his life,
also appeared in this child.
The film uses scientific means to
prove the existence of "soul" and the existence of
"reincarnation".
Reincarnation itself is a religious term,
and there is
no other word for it.
Do not rise to the level of science,
from a logical point of view this problem.
Who prescribes the existence of the medium of "soul" and
who prescribes the existence of the minority phenomenon of "reincarnation"
is arranged by God?
Why can't this be the existence of another state of science?
The things that have not been studied and understood and cannot be explained by scientific evidence
are God’s actions, or God’s actions?
Hundreds of years ago, people
on one side of the earth and people on the
other side could talk and see each other without having to meet each other.
Can this kind of thing that cannot be explained by science
be attributed to "that only God can achieve."
Now technology has done it,
Explain that it is not a matter of God, but that
science and technology have not yet reached that level.
Things that science cannot explain for the time being,
are attributed to God’s credit and God’s arrangement.
God's arrangement...
This is where I hate religion the most.
View more about I Origins reviews
