"The Taste of Cherry" is sour? Is it sweet?

Ivy 2022-03-25 09:01:22

"The Taste of Cherry" is the only Iranian movie I've ever seen. The film is non-violent, non-loving, and only the protagonist talks to various passengers from beginning to end, as a way to show his activities to end his life. The beginning part was a little monotonous, but because of the suspense, I wanted to know if the protagonist had ended his life and had the idea of ​​looking down. When I thought the film was to show world-weariness and desperation for life, I found that I was wrong. After watching the film, I found out that the film is actually discussing the meaning of life. It tells us that although life is difficult, there are many people who are struggling to survive. And every person in the film who rejects Buddy represents their reason for living. This work is very abstract, but it contains profound philosophical thinking.
The film uses a lot of monotonous long takes, a stylistic feature of Iranian cinema. Abbas' realist film style borders on documentary. Although this film does not have too much plot, nor does it explain too much about the ins and outs, it is not particularly boring, because it has suspense, leaving more space for the audience to experience and think. In the process of Buddy talking with people, some life philosophies are conveyed from the film, which makes the film have a depth of thought and an artistic charm.

View more about Taste of Cherry reviews

Extended Reading
  • Eryn 2022-03-24 09:03:37

    Abbas is the master of real time, looking at the bland but the sound creates a textured rhythm for us, we look at the characters in parallel in this time, all the information no longer seems to belong to the protagonist, but it seems to be more It is a film about the land. Varda once told the monstrous loess drama in the CC disc selection. At the same time, he thought that we will all return to the land. Who can not be moved by this scene? At the end, think about the last scene of "24 Frames",

  • Johathan 2022-03-28 09:01:12

    6.0/10 There are too many lectures, too few images, and the highlight moments are indeed full of "miracles", but they are too rare, forcing the audience to endure more than three quarters of an hour in the car's driver's seat - the front and rear of the passenger seat, and the outside of the window. Overexposure completely obscures the possible representation of the landscape. The urban construction in the distant view and the grassland under the sunlight in the close view have indeed achieved a coexistence of pastoral and industrial appearances, full of aftertaste, but after the lecturers who got on and off one after another, this could have been a more tragic and epic fate. The dignified or dignified landform has been reduced to a kind of "scenery" that is consumed by people and used to move themselves like "cherries", and is flattened. The script has no sense of structure at all, showing a one-way drag, which may overlap with the creator's intention. This layer of preaching is too obvious. If the male protagonist only uses his own observation of the surrounding (the camera is indeed always aimed at the male) The Lord’s Watching Act) to the final open ending will leave the audience feeling free as well. Too many images are only described in words and not shown: the whole picture of the pit by the tree, the dissection of quails, the appearance of the city, etc. Only the metaphor of war fits the bill.

Taste of Cherry quotes

  • Mr. Bagheri: When you want to help someone, you have to do it properly, with all your heart. It's better... more just and more reasonable.

  • Mr. Bagheri: Some things are easier to do than to say.