At the beginning of the movie, I think very few people can guess which interviewee will win in the end. But there is still a little clue from the point of view of naming the eight people at the beginning of the film, and the later plots are also verified: Chinese women and deaf people are not named after their skin color.
Some people ridicule that Chinese women take the lead out of the game, reflecting the fact that China is very representative of exam-oriented education that is ultimately facing failure. In fact, it is not very appropriate to say this. Have you noticed that before the Chinese woman started writing, she shook her legs, and the white man tapped the table with his fingertips. These are all manifestations of nervousness, anxiety, and impatience, but in the end, the Chinese woman was unable to control it. Anxiety in the heart, lack of adequate thinking, lack of a trace of calm, damaged the test paper. When it comes to damage, by the way, what the examiner said before the exam, someone concluded as follows:
1. "These pressures and pains are necessary." This implies that no matter how draconian the questions they face in the interview, they have to endure.
2. "Now before you is the final test", which implies how important this interview is.
3. "In this room, our rules are the only rules, and our rules are the only rules." This is very important. The reason why a few people slowly broke through the psychological defense line during the exam, regardless of the moral code, even The law is affected by this sentence.
4. "These 80 minutes will determine your destiny in the next 80 years", this sentence is also very important, which points out the meaning of this interview to the interviewee.
The person said that the examination criteria that the invigilator said was just a pretense for psychoanalysis, and it just added interest to the story. I think many viewers paid attention to this (in the film The subject’s attention is also on this), but the points I mentioned above are also key points, and it is these points that make the whole story full of conflict and contradiction. It's not unreasonable as he said, but what attracted me the most about that pretense was "In this room, our rules are the only rules, and our rules are the only rules." This reminds me of a story I saw earlier. A psychological film "Death Experiment", the two films have many similarities. The most profound point is that violence is uncontrollable, and the contradictions behind violence are surging secretly, which will escalate violence and life and interests. Become the keen attention of the public. But still "Death Experiment" is better and more reasonable.
But as a college student studying the foundation course of entrepreneurship. This movie is also good. Regarding rules, as the saying goes, rules are dead and people are alive. The invigilator interprets this saying very well, what moral code, the law is in front of his rules, no evaluation but enough to be on top. The contradictions between rules and laws, interests and morals always exist in reality, which is also the highlight of this film. What makes the interviewees in the film disregard the moral law is that they are in a specific environment (one with a certain kind of pressure in particular) because they are just as intensely pursuing their interests. "Death Experiment" is also a good illustration of this, but there is also a more obvious "character identity" in it. This video is also related, I wonder if you found it? When it comes to this time, it can also be regarded as talking about human nature. Let's start talking about those people of color. White is a typical villain, while Brown is a hypocrite. But will the rest survive this test of humanity? No one stopped Deaf when he was deceived, no one stood up when Dark was tortured, and Brown stood by while White was dying. In the end, everyone had the courage to pull the trigger, for a job or Speaking of an unclear goal, everyone is selfish enough to sacrifice other people's lives and everything that doesn't belong to them. How to choose between cooperation and selfishness? Can there be good cooperation only when personal interests are not involved? Perhaps cooperation requires a spirit of sacrifice, and in this era of personal heroism, what we lack is this spirit of sacrifice . But there are no saints in the world of profit. At this point, you will find that I haven't talked about BlONDE, I paid a lot of attention to her because she was the last interviewee, and she used her lines to summarize the test and the final victory. She is a good listener, pays attention to details, Have compassion for colleagues (tetanus villain WHITE).
I guess the teacher probably hopes that the students will learn useful experience from others, successful people and different people (it is also one of the purposes of watching this film). Here is a brief overview of her lines.
1. Regarding the final invigilator's statement that she was an audience, I recalled that: audience does not mean only listening and not expressing opinions. Compared with Nail, she listened humbly, and less often fought against each other.
2 For details, skip it. . . You have lived to this age yourself, and watching this video must have a deep understanding of the role of details, and I won't say much here. Let's just say a little bit and finally she had a flash of inspiration! Pick up DEAF glasses. . . The film reviewer wrote here and thought that WHITE took her test paper to do the experiment together, and gave it back to her and said thank you after it was done. This process presents a just right demeanor, no words, no objections, no thanks, soft eyes but revealing that you can't hurt me. This kind of demeanor shown to others is a little cold and indifferent, but it's worth it What we learn, of course, is inherently possible.
3 About mercy, everyone understands. . We have to admit that she comes with a lot of micro gear, but also her calm wit, using what she has to solve current problems. It is reflected in the first bundage for DARK, and then the villain WHITE was saved when the situation panicked.
Based on this, the bugs in the film came out
. Saving DARK Although the society is like this, although she is smart, she explained that as long as she is smart enough to seize the opportunity, everything will be just right, even the timely rescue is slightly pale
. 2 Use the hairpin to save the pills in the sink. Is there no way? Like with a pencil. . Oh sorry I forgot, out Chinese women may think of this, two pencils can be used like two chopsticks!
3 There is also a name in the film called Xuepin, I thought it was not a gun but a pencil that brought blood. Well this might be a bit far-fetched.
I would still like to discuss the characteristics of the finalized winner of the summary.
BLONDE's final stance and location do not violate the rule of leaving the examination room?
Have you ever thought that BLACK is the winner? Have you ever thought that being a senior leader requires sacrifice and bloodshed? How precious this is! Of course, the director and screenwriter have carefully designed this point, because BLACK is always not as perfect as BLONDE, it is not difficult to forget that after the trust in WHITE was trampled, he has always advocated cooperation and mutual assistance. , trapped WHITE. As Qian Zhongshu Weicheng said, "The viciousness of honest and honest people, like the gravel in the rice or the unclean thorn in the fish fillet, will give people an unexpected pain." This is what gives our audience this feeling. .
Having an idea is a good thing, after all, many successful entrepreneurs are based on this. The ultimate interviewer in the film had an idea, and getting them together was an excellent spark meeting without the invigilator present, and some of them suggested that the interview was a fun gamble for the rich to watch , some people think that the winner didn't say that there is only one person or maybe a group.... There are a lot of their special personal opinions, and so are the moviegoers. It's good to have an idea, grab him and be her.
Finally, let's talk about the DEAF that I seem to have skipped. He is not a person of color, he is deaf, he is a big boss. Why the setting is deaf? My point of view is that people who achieve great things cannot easily listen to others. They need to focus on the two secrets of success that Churchill said: never give up, look back when you want to give up, and never give up.
Not controlled by people! WHITE clocked 80 minutes himself, but it didn't play a pivotal role, and he was out by the time he realised it did. Hey, things are unpredictable. . .
The after-view also needs to leave some blanks like a work to let people think for themselves. (Finish)
View more about Exam reviews
