I thought it was a drama of reasoning, but after watching it, it seems that there is almost no reasoning. The whole play focuses on character characterization, with suspense and horror as the keynote. In the case of not reading the original book, "no one survived", the name makes the ending of the story obvious before it begins. The story develops slowly in the conflict of characters. In fact, when you review the whole article at the end, you will find that what the judge really does as a behind-the-scenes person is just to push the boat with the flow, and everyone's ending is closely related to their words and deeds. And in the end, when there is really no survivors, it makes people feel that this is the best ending. Although the judge kills with the intention of punishing the sinner, he still cannot be above the law or even replace the law. Human nature is really unpredictable and terrifying.
View more about And Then There Were None reviews
