How can such a judicial system be convincing

Aurelia 2022-11-06 19:52:32

I originally watched this show from a neutral standpoint, but since the video of the interrogation of the nephew of the fool was broadcast, it is really difficult to maintain a neutral standpoint! Some people may say that when the director was filming, he was biased, but I noticed that at the end of the video, a sentence from the nephew of the stupid one was something like "When will I be able to leave, I will be at 1:00 pm Can I go back to school before 29 minutes?" It can be seen that he did not realize how serious the "fact" he just admitted was a serious crime, he was just a 16-year-old boy who was taken to the police station for questioning by the police for no reason , Psychologically, they all want to satisfy the other party's question as soon as possible, so that he can leave the police station. And from his dialogue, it can be seen that he is indeed a relatively slow child. You induced him in this way to let him give the answer you want, and you can still testify. What is even more ridiculous is that the judge And the jury should have watched the video of this trial, right? Do you think there is no problem? As an ordinary person, when I watched this video, I felt that this kind of interrogation was too much of a joke.
It is said that this drama has been hotly debated by many parties after its broadcast, but unfortunately their appeals have been rejected all the time. I hope that even one day, the case can be re-trialed. There are too many things that don't make sense. May the Lord bless!

View more about Making a Murderer reviews