Released by an American studio and co-produced by France and Italy, the film scored well in the West. The plot seems to be simple. Ferdinand originally lived with his wife and children. He lost his TV job. After returning home from a boring party one day, he found that the person who looked after his children was an old friend of his, and he abandoned everything. go with her. Escaped from Paris to the south of France. A place full of weapons trafficking, political intrigue. Experience various encounters and adventures along the way. After a period of idyllic life, the heartbreak ended in the end. Abroad, this film is forbidden to watch under the age of 18, because a large number of anti-government ideas and murder plots are not conducive to young people. . . . . . (I watched it at the Shanghai Film Festival. There is no age limit for moviegoers in the theater, and many people left the show.) The filming method is the road movie that was popular in the United States in 1960. What is a road movie? It takes the car as the main line, taking people away from the city, emphasizing that the car can take people to more places, a symbol of greater freedom in the background at that time, hiding in the car You can walk around and hide at any time. This is also a style of the times. The auto industry was just beginning to flourish in the West at that time. This type of film overemphasized individualism and liberalism, and was once controlled by the government. (The film media is really able to guide human thoughts from left to right. I feel that in recent years, there have been many orientations of homosexuality. The family element has gradually been disintegrated, people have become isolated individuals, the government can better control people's thoughts, and there is no family support. Individual will It's very weak... it's too far... just some personal subjective opinions) This is a wayward director, a surreal film, Arthur Rimbaud is not directly in the film. mentioned, but several characters and even the quoted verses allude to many of the qualities of this rebellious poet. Arthur Rimbaud himself is a wonderful person, legendary short life and died at the age of 37, surrealist genius poet, works can not be clearly classified, anarchist, unemployed, worked as an arms dealer, ridiculed Commodity society, these characteristics are reflected by the director with the characters of the film, such as the couple Ferdinand and Marianne who escaped from Paris to the Mediterranean together in the film, they are unemployed, have no money, are anti-government, and kill. Marianne's husband Fred, A South African arms smuggler. Abandoning commodity society, the pursuit of happiness and dreams is expressed through a journey from Paris to the Mediterranean. (Personal opinion: this is what Europeans have pursued so far. Stay away from big cities and go to the south of the seaside city for vacation, leisure, and retirement. The Mediterranean generation is almost a place that has been pursued all the time.) But these two escaped from Paris and went to the south People who seem to be abandoning the commodity society on the surface, but in fact have been enjoying it all the time. A lot of oil paintings, literature and even comics are used in the film, and a lot of advertising slogans of that era are also used in the dialogues of characters. This film is just a fantasy of the director. Through the characters, it actually mixes the lives of several characters he may like very much. In addition to the Rimbaud mentioned just now, there is also a writer named Louis- Ferdinand Celine. In the film, the actor simply uses his name Ferdinand. I checked the information of this person and found that the two were astonishingly similar in appearance. It is also very similar, and in the film, the male protagonist has been writing diaries, writing articles, and reading books, which is a side of the writer, and two of his novels are quoted in the film. In addition to poets and writers, the male protagonist in this film also insinuates an oil painter, and a large number of oil paintings are constantly interspersed in the film. However, the oil painter, who was also an abstract painter, was called Nicolas de Stael. Many of his paintings were interpreted through the lens of the film's cinematographer, Raoul Coutard, such as the new bridge, red, and even the color he chose for suicide sticks in the film. This film can no longer be watched as a movie, discussing the plot, what story it is telling, and what it is advocating has become a pediatric subject. This film was pinched and pinched by Jean-Luc (director) and suddenly became a work of art, abstract, like oil painting, like poetry, like novel, a kind of artistic feeling and experience. The film is surreal, but it is based on the characters that exist in reality, the real, the real, the real and the fake, a perspective that expresses the director's own faulty emotions or his preference for these artists. I can only give some explanation based on my understanding. Although I don't understand this French film very well, it doesn't have a lot of spiritual resonance, and most of it is cultural incompatibility. I checked the profile of this person again, and surprisingly found that the two are very similar in appearance, and in the film, the male protagonist has been writing a diary, writing articles, and reading books, which is a side of the writer, and is quoted in the film two of his novels. In addition to poets and writers, the male protagonist in this film also insinuates an oil painter, and a large number of oil paintings are constantly interspersed in the film. However, the oil painter, who was also an abstract painter, was called Nicolas de Stael. Many of his paintings were interpreted through the lens of the film's cinematographer, Raoul Coutard, such as the new bridge, red, and even the color he chose for suicide sticks in the film. This film can no longer be watched as a movie, discussing the plot, what story it is telling, and what it is advocating has become a pediatric subject. This film was pinched and pinched by Jean-Luc (director) and suddenly became a work of art, abstract, like oil painting, like poetry, like novel, a kind of artistic feeling and experience. The film is surreal, but it is based on the characters that exist in reality, the real, the real, the real and the fake, a perspective that expresses the director's own faulty emotions or his preference for these artists. I can only give some explanation based on my understanding. Although I don't understand this French film very well, it doesn't have a lot of spiritual resonance, and most of it is cultural incompatibility.
View more about Pierrot le Fou reviews
