The defense jury counselor was great, but always had a grumpy, bravado feel. In the end, after he failed, he met the hero and heroine in the coffee shop, and accused the hero and heroine that you won't stop there, you'll be addicted, and you'll end up with nothing, which reflects himself, just like the prosecution lawyer in the bathroom In the end, the same as what was said to him, in the end he will still fail. Such a person does not want money, nor does he care about justice and morality. What he wants most is to control the success or failure of every trial and win the case. What strikes him the most is not moral preaching, but failure. Only after failure can he reflect on his actions. He has been using illegal and immoral means to deal with his opponents, and once someone more powerful than him uses the same means to calculate him, he will be furious, "How can you do this!", "You have no good end!", This is very hypocritical.
The prosecution lawyer has always had a calm and rational feeling that may not be the most powerful one. He didn't make a deal in the end, which is more in line with his character image, as expected. One thing is, if he accepts the deal, how will the hero and heroine treat him, and their appeals for the outcome of the trial are the same, so will they use a money order as a warning like they did to the last defense jury consultant? This thinking is meaningless, and now such a plot is reasonable.
Another point is whether the nature of the behavior of the male and female protagonists constitutes jury manipulation, which is not well understood.
View more about Runaway Jury reviews
