As a documentary, Making a Murderer was clearly a success. It has enough catchy titles, tense and exciting clips, and Netflix's successful way of broadcasting and operating it. Rather than calling it a feature-length documentary, Making a Murderer is more of an actual suspense drama. And the brilliant thing is that this show can make everyone who watches it feel very good: "We have seen all the doubts that the two attorneys saw!" "Such a far-fetched judgment is actually If it can be established, it turns out that the insiders of the legal system are only at this level." However, in the end, the director came to a To be continued, and slapped us back to reality. And the reality is, everybody's talking about the show, and everybody's avenging Steven and Branden.
So what are the facts? Is there any prejudice brought about by this show in our so-called vindication? Does the law need to listen to the voices of the masses? Steven's lawyers, the onlookers outside, is the best we can do is guesswork? If we can't prove that something happened, does that mean it didn't happen?
View more about
Making a Murderer reviews
