1. The photo A in the male protagonist's hand during the day was taken by Mr. B two weeks ago, and there is blood on it + Mr. B's hat + time-lapse camera
2. The photo B that night was given to him by his girlfriend. According to his girlfriend, "the original intimate photo was changed because of what happened now." The above is blood + Mr.B hat+timer+seal
then the bug is obvious. If photo B is obtained by temporary changes, why is photo A not changed? Or, conversely, I was always going to paint this, so what happened to the original kissing one?
So in fact, the original kissing photo was not at this time point at all (a long time ago), just because the scheming bitch was playing a big game of chess.
So, does that so-called photo change with what's happening now?
My understanding is that no, or rather, the scene captured in the photo, whether you execute it intentionally or not, that scene will happen.
Regarding this issue, there are several important misunderstandings about the photo in the film:
1. If the prophet does not follow the instructions on the photo, he will suffer divine punishment (death) - Reason: Mr.B's tragic death - Clarification: Female scientist The explanation is just an accident.
2. The photo will change with what is happening now (that is, changing the future) - reason: the scheming male protagonist's remarks - clarification: the photo has not changed at all, the NTR is a long time ago.
Now both theories are not valid, so, think about it carefully, have all the photo scenes that appeared in the film finally become reality?
It doesn't matter whether it is deliberately done because of the misunderstanding of the protagonist or by accident, in short, the scenes in the photos are indeed realized.
It feels like Schrödinger's cat. Whether people are dead or alive has long been determined, but we can't observe them. Once someone finds a way to observe them, the probability cloud collapses, and everything is a given.
As for whether it will change in the future, there is no discussion in this film. In general, a photo doesn’t explain much. I don’t think a photo can cause the wave function to collapse. The degree of freedom in the future is still very high, so when the future is still uncertain, it is impossible to discuss whether the changes will occur. . But the photo will not change, the scene predicted on the photo will not change, this is certain.
The most typical is the last scene. The note posted by the scheming bitch slowly fell, the camera on the opposite side pressed the shutter, and sent back the same photo from two weeks ago.
View more about Time Lapse reviews
