untitled

Evie 2022-03-25 09:01:14

The first thirty minutes were extremely "violent". This kind of "violence" has nothing to do with the content and methods, and in the momentum it shows, there is no word for it, but only because of the vastness of the picture and the grandeur of the object, it gives people a sense of All-round rolling look and feel.

For a moment, I seemed to feel the origin of primitive witchcraft and religion. In the face of creation, the human will has no chance of winning, only defeat. If there is a supreme god, it must be nature.

However, in the next hour, due to being interrupted in the middle, I can't determine whether it is because of the emotional fault, or the part of the hour explaining the relationship between humans and nature is too distracting and confusing to be comparable to the first half. And at one point, despite the lack of lines, the language of the camera is still full of emotion, even a little over the top.

The film was made in 1992, and I still saw a lot of scenes that have frequently appeared in major media and some films twenty years later, but most of them are religious.

Five stars for the first thirty minutes.

#The Collection of Moving News Pictures#

View more about Baraka reviews

Extended Reading
  • Braden 2022-03-27 09:01:14

    The crowd, especially the subway ticket gate and the constant montage of the chicken farm, is too cold

  • Lola 2022-01-07 15:54:11

    You know the impression of watching this kind of movie is, ah, I want to travel, the director chose to use new technology to shoot around a large circle of the earth, using the clearest and direct perspective to make the audience directly perceive the world in which humans live is the most authentic It is rare for a beautiful earth to be presented to the audience in such a complete and planned way