After reading it, think of something for your future self. I spent a lot of free time at work watching some very boring movies for entertainment, and then suddenly had a long and boring vacation, so I gathered up the courage to find a few movies that I wanted to watch. One is Blackjack recommended by friends when going to the casino during travel, the other is the blockbuster The Wolf of Wall Street that has been on "Want to Watch" for a long time, and the other is Hibernation just finished watching. The first two films have nothing to say, the theme types are similar, and The Wolf of Wall Street has about three hours. As for hibernation, I had a general understanding of the style before watching it, so I watched him at the end, and I watched it over several periods of time, with some long shots skipped in between. Somewhat looking forward to, because the few films left me with a very good experience. This kind of long-shot movie is always difficult to share with people, and you can spend a comfortable time alone. The movie is confusing and impatient from the beginning, maybe it's a translation problem, and people who watch the subtitles with the lines as the main line are exhausted. Everyone rambles, but from the subtitles, almost no one expresses the meaning clearly. And this is not a storytelling movie, it is called hibernation, it really tells about the state, the different states of various people. Although misunderstood , so that in the end I didn't feel that I understood what the director wanted to express, but almost every dialogue gave people a lot of time to think, and here I felt the benefits of long shots. So many dialogues and conflicts between people are more like a kind of inner struggle of the director or screenwriter, or the inner struggle of the moviegoers, mainly because I am very struggling. The reason why I am interested in watching it is mainly because I particularly like a movie in Iran, and I am both afraid and interested in Muslim culture. Religious ideas are mentioned in this film but it doesn't seem to be related, maybe it is related but I don't understand it. I haven't figured out any clues yet, so let's leave some straightforward clues. The protagonist is a retired comedian, elegant and well-bred and, according to critics, seems to be defined as a hypocritical intellectual. After watching the whole film, I didn't have the direct negative impression of this character as in the film review, and I felt very friendly to him. An old man who has lived a hard life since he was a child and earned a lot of money by his own efforts and married a young and beautiful wife. When he gets old and retire, he finds a quiet and beautiful place where he is isolated from the world. He uses the money he earned in the first half of his life to maintain a decent life for the last time. Also opened a very elegant little hotel, hosting decent people from all over the world. Decent people are used here, because at the end of the argument at a friend's house, the teacher mentions that his hotel is not open to refugees. He should have had a lot of sophisticated life experiences in the first half of his life, which caused him to be rational and pessimistic when he looked at many things. The two words used here are inappropriate. Reason is too positive and pessimism is too derogatory. I don't want to use his attitude towards the world. Any non-neutral word to describe it. He bought a horse because of an unintentional word from a tourist, and he didn't understand and didn't plan to tame it seriously. He prefers to donate anonymously and is reluctant to give direct handouts to difficulties. He cares about and relies on family and friends around him, but does not express it directly, intervene with action. Her wife, born in a good family with good upbringing, can be said to have never experienced hardship, married a rich and decent husband at a young age, and has enough financial strength to maintain her pampered life, and she has Unwilling to be bored, she wanted to express her kindness to the world, but couldn't find a suitable way, because although she was reluctant to admit it, she had to realize that the reality gap between herself and others was too great. Like her husband, she has a strong self-esteem, but financial independence makes her wary. She is accustomed to positioning herself on the moral high ground above others. In fact, this is the same as her husband, which is not derogatory. They ridicule each other, expose each other's scars, treat each other badly, and do nothing. After exposing each other's scars, they continued to live on each other's backs. Finally, the old man put down his dignity and confessed his dependence on his wife. The young teacher quoted a Shakespeare quote about the hypocrisy of the old man. The old man also satirized the idleness and moaning of these angry youths with one sentence. Actually I think the young woman really wanted to have a child of her own, but her husband couldn't give it to her. She was so young, beautiful and smart, yet so idle. Watching this film in a winter is really good. It got dark very quickly, and it was almost completely dark at five o'clock. It was extremely cold outside, and the heating was turned on in the house. Emotions after reading and ending this lazy weekend.
View more about Winter Sleep reviews
