The dead girl had a different name, and the detective took the photo to identify them at different times, and the family was not sure whether they were in contact with the same person. However, in the 2015 film version, out of the film's advantages, the story of the dead girl told by the family is shown in pictures, and the actress of the girl is the same person. It's almost a coffin that they are highly coincidental and have something to do with this girl. I think the answer that keeps the original open is better because it's more universal and true to the fact that it reflects that there are countless girls like this in the world who suffer misfortune at any time due to social injustice and the sins of others.
The play clearly expresses the left-wing views in the literary and art circles: accusing exploitation and class antagonism. The superficial point is that the wine and meat of Zhumen stink, and the road has frozen bones. Of course, it stands on a higher level: one is that there is an existence somewhere watching what we do; the other is that as a part of human beings, each of us must be responsible for each other (We are responsible for each other). But how is "responsible" achieved? Is it to help each other, rob the rich to help the poor, everyone is happy together, and the world is harmonious; or is it to teach people how to fish, encourage diligence, and become self-reliant, rich is the reward of diligence, and poverty is the responsibility of laziness? This is the difference between the left and the right.
WeChat public account: feidududu watching movies (feidudumovie)
View more about An Inspector Calls reviews