As for the teacher, from the beginning, his dualism showed that his thinking was a little extreme. So the movie finally tells us that he has a relationship with the heroine and treats the hero differently. Although it is unexpected, it is still reasonable. When a man who studies philosophy has all kinds of rational conditions, can he still be so rational and calm when he encounters personal matters? Maybe, still can't. This is a weakness of our nature that cannot be corrected, and this is what makes us human. The story develops to the end, but a jealous man uses his power to execute a series of YY. In the world he envisaged, human abilities are unchanged and have not progressed over time. Could it be that prehistoric human beings needed a wealth of knowledge before they began to learn to farm for survival? Need to be the best teacher! Their year in the shelter can also learn to lay the foundation for future survival. The immutable view of man is not a theory of development, nor does it correspond to reality.
How can we deny the possibility of such a story even though it is the product of a teacher's jealousy?
View more about After the Dark reviews
