Talking about the world in front of an idealistic warrior, you will be left behind by his mouth and will.

Lesly 2022-03-24 09:02:26

The beginning of the story is the footage that the warden begins to prepare before he goes to work. Through him, he began to introduce the prison environment, prisoners, and prison guards. He can be regarded as an introduction to medicine, and it has little to do with the background of the story, but it is indeed related.
Then the director started to portray another character, a political prisoner with a shoehorn face. As soon as I came in, I said to the warden with a proud face: I won't wear a criminal's prison uniform. Then there was a moment of silence. Shoehorn began to undress, and through him began to accept the cell. Then I started to misunderstand the director. The scenes of dung painting the wall, forcing out the radio, masturbating in the middle of the night, etc., made me think that this is a political film with black humor and no standpoint.
After 24 minutes of non-camera switching, including some conversations between the protagonist and the priest, and a long shot of sweeping urine for nearly three minutes, I began to collapse... But I was still too naive.
The second half of the film started to feature a lot of Sands' sick body and the monologue in medical terms of the doctor, and I began to understand that it was not what I thought at all, and the director was still playing the sensational way.
If you understand the story of the little pony then you understand what Sands is fighting for. He just wanted to gain the respect of his companions and enemies, and even if it was a punishment in the end, he was willing to bear it.
'I know the causes and the effects'. Who can say anything to a person who lives so clearly?

View more about Hunger reviews

Extended Reading

Hunger short comments

Arnulfo 2022-04-23 07:02:58

The director exposed the wound and showed the suffering to the audience. However, right and wrong are dissipated in the calm and cold lens. This is the dance of the sword of politics, the winner is the king and the loser is the bandit. Uncle Fa made me realize that there is a second Bell in the world, and that famous 17-minute long-shot conversation is actually the key to understanding the film.
Chase 2022-01-03 08:01:32

First-class photography and lens capture; 17 minutes of methodically processed long-term lens; Michael Fassbender's very powerful performance; very good real-life adaptation of the film~~~ How many people are willing to sacrifice their lives for their beliefs, and how many countries are willing to face it. Your own dishonorable history?