time Machine

The movie's imagination is good, but unfortunately the movie does not reasonably explain its own theory at the end. Why can't change the past through time and space is still a contradiction. The movie uses a logical contradiction to explain something that is already contradictory. This kind of The explanation is undoubtedly ridiculous in this movie, and it is not convincing at all. If the past cannot be changed, how can the different ways of dying be? Isn't this a change? Since the method of death can be changed, why can't death or living be changed? Is there any difference between these two things for the pure logic and the pure material world? The only difference is the emotion that people put on it. It is ridiculous to think that death is a momentous time for people, but moving from one place to another is not. This is how things should be. It can only be said that people have destiny, and fate is in the hands of God. Just like an old Chinese saying that the king of hell will let you die at the third watch and will never delay it until the fifth watch. And in the end the movie tries to solve this illogical thing in a logical way, it's just ridiculous.
From 1899 to 2030, I only feel that the intelligence of 2030 is too poor. Such intelligent programs not only do not provide what people want, but also constantly mislead and disturb people's thinking. I always feel that this should not be the face of future intelligence development. In 2037, the moon was broken and the earth suffered a catastrophe. It can be seen that the earth has experienced periods of land reconstruction and glaciers. I thought that after 800,000 years, the newly created race was the result of the re-evolution of life on earth, but the result was not. It is civilization that has regressed to the primitive period. I always feel that this is a bit unreasonable. Even if life was difficult at the beginning, human beings should rely on their own technology at the beginning (I have to say that in terms of the ability of human beings to adapt to the environment, in front of nature, The survival ability of human beings is really too weak), then what can survive should be the result of technological protection, civilization will not regress like this, take a step back, even if civilization regresses in a certain period of time, according to the saying in the movie, the big When the disaster came, not everyone fled to the ground, and some people lived on the ground. It can be seen that the ground can still survive. Moreover, after so many years, it can be seen that the ground is very suitable for human habitation. Why has not developed civilization again. , after all, some things of previous civilizations have been preserved after endless years, just like that intelligent system, with such a simple and convenient way of development, why do human beings choose such a difficult road to walk, and all the people Living only for one person, living like an ant, all people are just dominated by this brain, this is too unreasonable. The evolution of this brain is also very strange. There is only one subject. How can we ensure that the offspring after hybridization still have such super-powerful abilities? After all, it is not the queen that can produce infinitely. what?
This movie gives a lot of very good imaginations, but it can't control these imaginations very well, but it can still be watched for science fiction.

View more about The Time Machine reviews