. Compared with the lineup of this film, the screenwriter is really casual and summed up the difference between qualified and good-looking. It's really that little bit. How can the screenwriter be too careless? There was a question in front of me saying that the flight attendant's plot was inexplicable. So pasted the answer here:
I feel that the director and actors of this film are all online, but the screenwriter's signal is too bad or it drops from time to time. After watching, you can only make up your mind that jonny is Kong's ex-boyfriend or something and then grow old When the man asked her, it was a joke, right? Both of them were joking. They said that the atmosphere was a cliché, but Nima's background was very innocent.
In fact, didn't the flight attendant have a lot of flags? De Niro said it repeatedly. After finishing the last vote, Lao Bai complained that you said it every time. The last time he confessed to himself that this time it must be Lao Tzu who wants to buy this bar for his birthday. Then Norton asked him what was worth your risk. There is a reason. Turning your back, the camera falls on his flight attendant
girlfriend The joke about the gang boss coming to collect debts clearly understands that a second-tier conflict can be designed and Lao Bai himself said that he was afraid, so he missed the point. The boss of the creditor also knows this is the case. If Norton's anti-water can be linked to this It's obviously more reasonable than the nonsensical middle-aged boy image he designed in the script. Another point is that there is a foreshadowing here, who is hiding this thing in the piano. It is reasonable to say that the owner of the scepter is also of unknown origin. You guys put so much effort into bringing things in from the piano, but they were detained because they failed the quarantine for termites. I just deducted a little bit of explanation and didn't even explain it. In fact, with all these plots strung together, it should be a very fierce masterpiece. The result was all wasted by the screenwriter.
As for the role of the actor Lao Bai, it's a true performance. I really like him. Later, these half-hundred old man's neurotic images became the wretched neuroticism of drinking in the bathtub, almost full of metal possession. This kind of late hero image is wretched and cunning.
De Niro Don't say that this is a qualified weirdo. It's unreliable and unreliable. It's absolutely not to be loyal and affectionate. I beg him like an old white dead dog. He knew something was wrong, but he still took this job. You said he was for a woman, but People have been sober all the time, go in and know that there is a way to get things, and know that the package
is lost tm has a grudge against him. It's totally cheating on this character Why didn't you describe his heart in front of the sophomore youth, so the first time Norton deliberately turned off the surveillance and let De Niroka be in the air was very inexplicable. In fact, the sophomore youth just wanted to watch this senior look shriveled. Besides, there is also a foreshadowing by that old man here. If you come down for a long time, something will definitely happen. You are wasting your time here. It's a real man. Then you lurked for so long before and exposed you. How will you mess up in the future? Since you are so ruthless, I thought it would happen. Shooting that old man to death also reflects your crazy character. In the end, you just shut people up and don't lock the door
. Isn't it okay to look for trouble?
In the end, what you really can't complain about is that the reason you went to grab this thing to eat alone is because you can't get angry. De Niro leans on the old and sells the old to prove his strength as a young man
Of course, these comments are all based on a good movie. If it's just a commercial film, it's not bad. Those crazy things say that I can guess the old plot at the end. Why don't you die? Nima pigs can guess the plot of the stealing movie. It must have been stolen. In the end, the main character team didn't steal it. It was a comedy or a suspense film. Movies, what the hell, you guys can stop watching movies in the future, because except for the suspense genre, there may be countless interpretations from one template. Isn't the other kind of routine? I can see the result, so it is said that Chinese films are different from the audience level, and the framework is the same. Of course, what you watch is the details. Is
n't the point of watching a stupid stealing movie the process of watching stealing? By the way, the details in this film are still well designed. At the beginning, the hacker teammates who went to the black computer to pretend to be forced met
the It's reasonable to report it and immediately strengthen the defense. Finally, opening the safe has always been the highlight of this kind of stealing movies. It's also quite intentional and in line with Norton's plan when he saw De Niro before. Norton also asked. In this way, it can be done in 15 minutes. People are very calm and say that it is a simple physical principle. At most 15 minutes,
I thought at the time that it must be violently dismantled, but I didn't expect it to be like this. It's a pity that this screenwriter said such a crazy routine. For example, De Niro should ask Norton about the details of the layout of the plumbing and plumbing in buildings. Norton and the audience are confused. I can understand De Niro's strength. The last paragraph is a little more straightforward.
The last escape is also a good foreshadowing. In general, this stealing process should be basically full marks, except for the inexplicable reversal of Norton's appearance.
View more about The Score reviews
