I was bored two days ago. I went to the AMC on 52nd Street to watch the midnight show. I never thought that it would coincide with the eve of the release of Lurk 3. The theater was full of posters. Even the staff were wearing promotional T-shirts. Scarlet letter, scarlet dazzling. While I was excited, I muttered, thinking that this fellow Zhan Wen ran to film The Conjuring 2, why did he also start the Lurk 3 at the same time? It was later found out that it was just a name. My enthusiasm persisted until I watched the pre-screening trailer, and then I let it go. Follow the order and give you the preview address first https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HxEXnVSr1w (This is the U tube, brothers in the wall, please solve it yourself.) The ghost chases people, bursting point Constantly, looks good right? But the thing is my anticipation for it is stuck in Jenwin's lurking 1,2. But the trailer kept my expectations down. Changed the protagonist of the former Hollywood 3rd-tier actor, but retained the actors of the goddess squad. How can I see how it is reducing the cost of the actors and playing a familiar face. This is completely without concern for the performance of the plot acting skills, and the abacus is rattling. , is the smell of copper. The plot structure is probably that a girl/teenage ghost is on her upper body and sleeps in the spiritual world. It seems to be almost copied from the first one, with no creativity and no bright spots, full of utilitarianism of selling whatever is good for sale, not thinking about progress, and deducting points. The evil spirits are too prosperous, they hide in the sky, hunt for strange broken limbs, and pursue visual stimulation. There is no sense of horror that is unique to Zhan Wen's Asian cold foreshadowing, and then points will be deducted. There is also the dance of demons in the climax part. I probably saw the shemale bride, the red devil, and other 12 bosses getting together and familiar with each other. The way the backbone is selling the audience's feelings and not the scriptwriter's logic basically shows the director's guilty conscience. Buckle buckle. And the director. I have never seen a few screenwriters and directors in the industry who can score more than 60 points. above. The film has not been released, so I can't say anything. My personal conclusion is: considering the foundation set by the first two films, the film's quality will not be lower than 5 points, but if you want to see new ideas, you can avoid it. Full of flamboyant popcorn flavor.
View more about Insidious: Chapter 3 reviews
