the actors are all as close to real people as possible. This is the conscience of the industry. Now basically the biographies of the main actors and the character prototypes are 108,000 miles away. Relying on acting to make up for it, it actually looks awkward. I remember the 40th season of "Saturday Night Live" complaining about the fact that the biographies are not at all like real people, so it was almost impossible to play black people with white people. It is estimated that there are many images in movies such as "The Imitation Game" and "The Grand Budapest Hotel". It has nothing to do with historical archetypes.
The scene is also as close as possible to the real situation at the time, but the movie is not a complete restoration of the historical facts, and the scenes in the historical facts are definitely not very beautiful. After all, this is a movie. Based on history, it can be modified and artistic. Honestly, though, the set design here is way better than some Oscar-nominated ones. Maybe the scene design requirements are consistent with the content of the film. Once there is a deviation, it will not be nominated for good or bad looks. There is no bias, no matter how ugly you can be nominated.
The clothing design basically uses Saint Laurent brand clothing. Is there no room for this? who taught you? Saint Laurent worked at Dior in his early years. The best scenes and costume designs of the Oscars in recent years are basically based on the Dior show. When I look at this work experience, it might be the Oscar for best costume and set design. As a result, these "Biographies of Saint Laurent" didn't even make it into the primary selection... I'm sorry, don't these crews have the money to hire a costume designer? It's understandable that Chanel's biography is difficult to be nominated in the fashion design. This Nima worked at Dior, so it can't be nominated... I suddenly feel that no matter what biography of a costume designer can be mixed It's time for nominations.
Photography is relatively common, that is, the photography of generally high-quality romance films. With the actor's acting skills, it is natural to dare to use close-up on the basis of confidence in the actor. But this is a biography of a fashion designer, dear... I'm not mistaken, photography is completely free. The environment and clothing in the front are not free, but Nima is free in photography... In photography, these costume designers should be nominated for the Oscars because of the names of these costume designers... Let me slap, all the biographies of costume designers in recent years I can't get any nominations... Anyway, I have some achievements in the visual nomination...
The soundtrack can't reflect the changes in the characters' hearts, and the rhythm can't keep up. Too classic, not popular enough.
The performance is exquisite, especially the male lead, but he is French. It seems that it is not good to mix with the Oscar. After all, the Oscar has a lot of limitations. In recent years, the nominated male actors are basically in English. Only when there is content in the eyes can emotions be "infected" to the audience. Ninety also showed Saint Laurent's attitude. From him, you can see what kind of artist is, a very contradictory, sensitive, gifted and somewhat morbid person. Artists are not lunatics. The first thing to declare is this. Anyone who plays an artist into a lunatic will not get any prizes, but will also get a full body of saliva.
Saint Laurent is very emotional in the film, which is understandable. After all, it can be seen from the records of major events in his life that Saint Laurent himself is really emotional. After all, the fashion director at that time had to be responsible for accounting, personnel arrangements, etc., which made people unable to complain. This reality makes people want to ask, is it even cleaning and cleaning the toilet together?
Saint Laurent's parents made him do military service, which made him miserable. No one in this place can understand why an artist would find it a pain to dedicate himself to his country. I hate Military life as much as he does. In fact, it is easy to understand that art is free, and the military has a high degree of unfreedom. It is understandable that people who are obsessed with art hate living in the military. And he's gay, basically solderers have a tendency to discriminate gays. This is a very annoying aspect, we appreciate their service, but anyone with any tendency to discriminate deserves to be discriminated. There is no room for discussion on this point.
In response to the question, Saint Laurent said, "Designing women's clothing is my battlefield." This sentence is true, even without him the military can also win the war, there are still so many chauvinists thinking of joining the military, they are proud of dieing for their country. It is predestined that who should do what, and forcible change will only ruin things. His talent was buried just like that. Can you just blame bad luck? Chauvinists should reflect on this. Even a national crisis is unlikely to change its nature. Dior wasted a talent for fear of bad influence. The media kills people, and the nature of the media's incitement has never changed. Almost all the films in the 87th Oscars criticized the mass media, and false reports killed people. Turing in The Imitation Game, Husband in Gone Girl, Regan in Birdman, etc. After "Birdman" won the award, the Chinese media still had the face to comment, commenting on your grandmother as a ball, it was just them, and the film directly scolded them for being stupid [beep--], but these media were really stupid [beep--] to the end.
Charlotte Lebon is reminiscent of Grace Coddington, the creative director of American Vogue, before the car accident. She doesn't seem to be in this movie...
After that, Saint Laurent created its own brand, which is also impossible. After all, everyone is afraid of mental illness. As I said, the mass media kills people... You can be driven crazy without being crazy. People who don't understand art see art practitioners as crazy. (Note that I am talking about art practitioners, not entertainment practitioners. Those who gossip, idols, and stars are entertainment practitioners.) Imagine a person who is insulted and beaten all day long, and his family still doesn’t understand and is not crazy Weird.
It's really hard to have no money, especially if you miss an opportunity, it's even harder. Ordinary people are like this, let alone a creative master.
I keep losing my hair after the treatment. It's crazy, really crazy! People with hair don't know the sadness of those with hair loss. Just look at what JK Simmons and Meng Fei often mention, it's really a very distressing thing to have no hair.
After that, the business went smoothly and started to hold fashion exhibitions. But it's really sad to have five seasons a year. These five seasons are not spring, summer, autumn, winter, men's clothing, but early spring, spring and summer, early autumn, autumn and winter, and advanced customization. So you can't blame the clothing brand for not being creative. Even if you are creative, you have to use it sparingly, so you can use it for a few more years. Just look at Chanel and Dolce & Gabbana, and it has been more than five years since several innovative ideas were used over and over again.
Saint Laurent lost his creativity twice. It should be said that he lost his muse twice. Once was the model. He liked that model very much. The model was his best friend. Naturally, he lost his best friend. The second time was the death of his second lover. This "beautiful man" was so ugly that he could fall in love with him. Karl Lagerfeld also liked that "beautiful man". , The words of Xishi come out of the eyes of lovers...
Everyone loves to collect beautiful items, but the aesthetics are different, and of course it has a lot to do with whether they have money or not. Saint Laurent too.
People say that the artist has a great temper, and that's not always the case. One of the details is that his first lover said that his speech was illiterate. I guess some people's mothers often say this. When I hear someone say this now, I have the urge to slap her, which is really annoying.
To be honest, the design of Saint Laurent in Dior is like living, powerful and impressive. After that, his designs don't have such a strong sense of visual impact. Dior's designs are not all impressive, Christian Dior and John Galliano are impressive. In this film, some of Christian Dior's ideas were provided by Saint Laurent. If he has always been creative director, maybe Galliano is now in this position. Dior's other short-lived designers are really unimpressive. Raf Simmons This definitely ruins Dior's rhythm, because Raf Simmons is self-taught, so he's already doing a good job... But Dior's virtue is really unbearable.
Because I have to see all the fashion shows every season, I am not impressed with any brand. Noticing Chanel, LV, D&G just because of a fashion show. The film mentions Chanel, but I am not very impressed with Chanel. Most of the time, the impression is that it is an old and conservative brand, which has nothing to do with youth. LV gives me the impression that it is only local tyrants and stereotypes. However, LV, Chanel, and D&G in a certain two years are still remarkable.
Saint Laurent only noticed it because he has been busy with materials for the past two years, because the name is easier to remember. I recently noticed this brand just because I saw the movie and learned about Saint Laurent himself. The design works of Saint Laurent Benn are too close to the style of Dior, and there are also works by Oscar de la Renta, so people often feel that the brand characteristics are not strong. In the end, the designs of these two people were mixed with Galliano. I thought they were all designed by Galliano... It is not good to be a teacher from the same school, but the good thing is that the famous teacher discovered his talent, The bad thing is that they are too close to tell the difference. Please don't count Ralph Simmons...
I'm impressed with Alexander McQueen's own work and Dior in Galliano's time. Basically, these two have created two genres in the fashion industry, one dark and one classical. Every year Oscar nominations for costume design projects have the style of these two. Naturally, as we all know, it is usually the Dior style that wins.
Armani has always been unique, and this one is impressive. Armani is a very elegant and popular brand, very contradictory, but with a strong sense of visual impact. Armani's elegance needs to be discovered by heart. But for some reason, this brand is always tepid. In fact, Armani's clothes can be regarded as the conscience of the industry. Every season has different ideas, but it is too expensive ah ah ah ah ah ah ah!
Valentino and Wang Weiwei were only noticed because of some fashion blockbusters. Valentino's fashion blockbusters are often photographed very well. After all, it is either Spanish or Italian photographers. The fashion blockbusters in these two regions are basically the best. . But when it comes to the visual impact of a single product, it is really difficult to leave an impression.
Gucci is also memorable just because of a few clothes and overwhelming advertisements, I remember "Gucci", and I even mixed the brand logo with D&G and Chanel. The first time I saw the logo of Saint Laurent, I thought it was a derivative of LV. Finally, after taking stock of the world-class trademark masters, I understand why they are so similar, he designed them all by himself.
I noticed that Oscar de la Renta was actually because of Galliano, because he was going to take over the brand, and then looked at the history of de la Renta. So I just realized the situation mentioned in one of the above paragraphs.
The brands that I have noticed now are Gareth Pu, Wang Daren, MMM, Moschino, Maison Margiela, and shoes designed by Ralph Simmons………………
Respect the fashion workers~TAT is not easy Ah, with such a large workload in a year...the people who basically work well are the same as Saint Laurent, bending over, hunchback...hair loss...
View more about Yves Saint Laurent reviews
