When the money bag fell, I thought of "The Terminator", which is just the difference between "returning to the past to save the father" and "designing the future to save the son". This movie is not complicated, and people who can foresee the future are affected by certain events Triggered and started the action of saving one's life (the screenwriter did not explicitly say, let the audience think of it by themselves). Several stories were connected because of this, and the clues were also explained. As for the timeline, I think it is impossible for the director to not know, he probably did not intend to. I have to study it carefully, because it will only make the intention of this film ambiguous. As far as I feel after watching it, there is neither the sentimentality of sacrifice for love, nor the impermanence of fate to see the world, nor the hatred for the sins of gangsters, just an interesting story, This is probably the effect that the director wants. Why do you say that? Because those emotions will bind the audience, and the current effect can give the audience their own space. The title No emotion can long retain its own individual form says chaos.
Speaking of Predicting the future, it is logical to predict the driving force, but not the outcome, because the unknown always exists. This leads to the question, at what point did the forecaster make the prediction, and what was the event that triggered this prediction? If the unknown factor If it is added, it must be constantly revised, which is equivalent to denying the prediction. When the characters in the play make predictions, they also need to be triggered. The director did not discuss the triggering factors at all, because it is impossible, even if it is like
View more about The Air I Breathe reviews
