Then the third and final chapter, using the British Museum as a gimmick, does not really reflect the characteristics of the British Museum. The Asian exhibition area and the Egyptian exhibition area are completely different. If you watch it for the British Museum, you may be disappointed.
But I think it's ok! The lines of the pharaoh's family are more humorous. The little pharaoh's mother introduced herself as "0000 Pearl of the Nine Seas" (forgot the first half) and felt very handsome. It is no wonder that the little pharaoh insisted on calling the male protagonist "Brooklyn's". Guardian" and thought it was more handsome. (Suddenly I understand why I didn’t take the pictures as they were in the Egyptian exhibition area. It seems a bit difficult to get hundreds of resurrected mummies together :p)
The part of Pompeii is quite funny, and it’s just this kind of theme that can make such a platter. Kind of funny.
The first two films have arranged ambiguous girls for the male protagonists, which are simply omitted now, and replaced by kisses with monkeys. Is cross-species love really used to brush the fashion value? In fact, I would rather the male protagonist and the Tyrannosaurus rex have a happy end. The first part has signs of it, right? The second and third parts have too few short-handed scenes!
Speaking of this, Lancelot also had a good laugh in the part where he killed the "dragon". The jokes are really subtle... The rest of the "smiles" feel rather boring, such as letting Ben Stiller alone The second battle pretends to be a primitive and falls in love with a chubby female security guard, and every time a crisis occurs, a group of museum collections are out of use.
In all fairness, the climax part is not as exciting as the first part, and several turns in the third part are very abrupt. For example, Lanstro saw the monkey hanging up and suddenly woke up and returned the plaque to the male protagonist...
The members of the Natural History Museum decided to reunite the little pharaoh's family and not revive him. Such parting came too suddenly (precious exhibits can be handed over as soon as they are handed over?!) When I brushed it for the second time, I noticed that it was not unreasonable, such as When Lancelot was just resurrected, Roosevelt emphasized that "we are real", and after Lancelot grabbed the plaque and went to Camelot, he said, "Camelot is not real, Lancelot is not real. Yes, it's just a character in a legend, you and I are both wax figures." This emphasis has paved the way for the male protagonist to resign and leave the museum for the boss.
So the male protagonist said goodbye to his exhibit friends who relied on the magic plaque to resurrect, lived a "real" life, went to college again, got a degree, and started teaching.
Three years later, because of the touring exhibition of the "Precious Exhibits of the British Museum", the plaque temporarily returned to the Natural History Museum. The exhibits were resurrected again, and the party was held as usual.
Understandable, but I still feel a little sad that it ends like this.
Fortunately, there is a golden subtitle at the end of the film:
"magic never ends"
View more about Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb reviews
