I guess there should be a lot of friends who have the same idea as me.
2. Not really interesting, especially after watching the first two.
It's cheesy and cheesy from start to finish, but Hugh Jackman's cameo made me laugh twice.
Originally, I had no expectations for this film at all, but I went to the theater to watch this film out of love, respect and memory of Robin.
Overall, this is a mediocre sci-fi comedy.
There is no discussion value, but there are some commemorative meanings left.
If it weren't for the memory of Robin, I would not have gone to the theater to see this movie.
Fortunately, there were no expectations, so there is no disappointment to speak of.
3. This type of comedy story has too poor scalability. The result of making a sequel can only be simply repeating itself, becoming less and less exciting. Maybe even the main creators themselves are weak, and the audience is even more unable to laugh. .
When the first part was filmed, there was still the creative value and appeal of the story, "the resurrection of the exhibits in the Natural History Museum", which is quite interesting to think about. But repeating the same routine three times is really not a wise decision. In the end, it can only be reduced to another mediocre work on the Hollywood commercial assembly line, and it has to rely on the consumption of lost actors to play warm and nostalgic cards to attract audiences to the theater. .
Ugh.
4. Compared with the first two parts, the story is no progress, or even regressing.
The way the writers added something new to the story was simply to move the location from the Natural History Museum in New York to the British Museum in London, and it's really hard for them.
The film uses a big subtitle "Secret of the Tomb" to emphasize this seemingly great "secret" - the final suspense, which turns out to be "the plaque needs to be sunbaked in the moonlight".
I really want to talk dirty.
5. The first five minutes also gave me a strong excitement of a "fantasy blockbuster", but after watching the whole film and thinking back to the beginning, I felt that this so-called flashback scene with a "big" temperament is simply a "big budget". There's nowhere to spend", this scene merely accounts for the pharaoh's parents being transported to the British Museum. The "gorgeous" opening didn't work as it should, and it can be achieved in another effective, practical, and cheap way without being top-heavy.
6. Finally, in order to commemorate and remember Robin Williams forever, you are a real good actor, thank you for the thought and laughter you brought us.
Heaven is with you.
View more about Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb reviews
