. As for the main text, I have watched the feature film several times and have a lot of feelings, but the thematic perspective created by the film blindly reminds humans of the abuse of animals. Many aspects of people's lives are based on the consumption of animals, but a population of Survival is a cycle, but the theme perspective wants to feel the pain through people's perspective of helpless animals, and awaken people's love for animals, not to mention whether people directly abuse, kill, and animals. Is the world gone? There is no such thing among the same ethnic groups, but life itself is a cycle, in the form of a food chain, elements constitute cells, microorganisms absorb elements and cells to maintain the life cycle (from birth to death), small animals, or plants absorb elements , microorganisms, etc. to maintain the cycle, herbivores eat plants, microorganisms, etc., carnivores eat herbivores, humans eat carnivores, plants, fruits, etc., human beings eat animals to become citizens of the earth, do they eat plants, fruits, etc. Isn't it cruel? Animals eat animals, animals eat plants, plants eat plants, and plants eat nutrients. Isn't this cruel? Is it right? Have you considered the feelings of plants, the feelings of elements, and the feelings of animals? ?
Don't mention to me what animals have feelings and plants don't. These are completely human feelings to define the feelings of the things we perceive. To put it bluntly, they are all based on your feelings. Animals and plants cannot think in other places. ? In your words, it is called a citizen of the earth. In fact, you can expand your horizons. They are all part of the universe, part of the earth, a kind of existence on the earth's chain, just an existence that converts one form of energy into another form of energy, of course. Some of this is a transformation process that is unacceptable to human morality, some unnecessary abuse, etc. This process continues continuously, either in the past tense or in the future tense. Things in the universe continue this chain like this. One thing Affecting other things is just the conversion of various forms of energy.
The theme of the film is mainly based on exposing the consumption and influence of human beings on animals of different races, blindly wanting to attract human beings to love animals, and being nice to the animals around them is not wrong, but what should be eaten should still be eaten and done. In addition, do you know (a story about sheep, people, wolves, and grasses, humans have eliminated wolves in order to protect sheep more, sheep have less natural enemies, lack fighting spirit, exercise, etc., and their immunity degenerates and becomes very fragile) , Gradually the sheep also disappeared, the grass lacked the nutrients and elements of the animals, so it also disappeared, and people naturally disappeared) Caring for animals does not mean to destroy the chain of the universe, the chain of the earth, and the chain in nature , say you are merciful, have you considered plants and other elements on the earth! In the chain, it is either forward or backward, and it is constantly moving. If you think that stillness is perfect, then you can imagine that you are saying that there is no universe, and the individual has no thinking. This is perfect, isn't it cruel? ? You deprive other links of the right to enjoy life and think about life, isn't that cruel?
The film should not be blindly congruent, the starting point is too narrow.
Therefore, don’t blindly engage in animal protection campaigns, dieting campaigns, etc. (PS Have you considered the feelings of plants and bacteria? Parents’ feelings Is it? Animals have never been violent to humans, have they killed them?)
View more about Earthlings reviews
