The ingenious beginning is refreshing. When I first saw the beginning, I thought it was the same as the first one, nothing new, but after reading it for a while, I found that there was another chapter, a very good idea!
When watching the first, second, and third films, and seeing the murderer kill, what comes to mind a lot of times is not resentment towards the murderer, but the helplessness towards those women who can only scream. It is only right and proper to die, it was voted unanimously by people all over the world, and immortality is a shame for society, lowers the global human IQ, and hinders human progress.”
But in this fourth installment, that kind of scene is gone, although sometimes there are still some problems (for example, two women see their friend being killed on the opposite side, they just stand in front of the window and watch without knowing the notification The policeman in front of the house didn't even shout, but only knew how to call NO at the window. Only the heroine knew how to run over to help. Although she was a bit stupid, she didn't even take any weapons.
Now when I see a murderer kill, I actually get angry at the murderer and can't wait to pull the murderer out and beat it up. It's a huge improvement, and it proves that it resonates with me, no longer makes me feel like it is I'm watching a farce.
There are two other points I want to complain about:
First, those women will never lock the door or the window, so that the murderer can easily enter the house. And even if the door is locked, the murderer can actually Open the door and enter the house without destroying the door, which makes me feel really helpless to the screenwriter's IQ. Can you write it as the murderer who broke the glass of the door and window and then open the door and enter the house? All right? Do you treat the audience as IQ as you always play against pigs?
The second point, I don't know if it's the students in the US that really do that, or if it's the editor's unique IQ problem. If a normal person encounters such a terrifying murder case, they should pay attention to safety. But seeing those students, they still go to celebrate, and they do not close their doors at home, so that people can come and go at will. Is this an American "habit"?
This is definitely not seen in Chinese movies. There are two doors in front of Chinese houses, and the balcony at the back is an anti-theft net, and sometimes a gate is added. If it was the kind of murderer in the film who wanted to go in, he might vomit blood, because it was a bit mysterious to want to go in with just a dagger. Once the door closes, you don't even want to come in. Like those American houses, there seem to be houses on the front, back, left and right, and there are glass everywhere, and the security net is even more impossible.
Forgive me for getting off topic. What I want to say is that the American houses are so easy to enter. I heard that they will prepare a gun for themselves to defend themselves, but why is there no one with a gun in the film at all? The gun that appears is not the police, or the murderer come. For the smooth development of the plot? Oh I get it, great screenwriter!
In the end, let me complain again: Dewey, your marksmanship should really be practiced. The distance error of a few meters is one meter. Did you practice marksmanship in a school for the blind? Or was it actually the light bulb you aimed at in the first place, not the murderer?
View more about Scream 4 reviews
