but I have to say that the writer
and director wanted to justify Modigliani's name,
but it was counterproductive.
1
There is really no need to put Picasso together to talk about things.
It's not comparable at all.
If the 20th century is to recommend four great artists,
one of them must be Picasso,
not Modigliani.
In fact,
Picasso, Dalí, and Matisse are considered to be the three most representative artists of the twentieth century.
If there are four representative artists in human history,
one of them must be Picasso.
There can still be no Modigliani.
Therefore,
the two are not comparable.
If Modigliani is the most advanced fighter jet,
Picasso is the UFO.
Can this be compared.
Therefore, the writer and director must take the conflict between the two as one of the main lines, which has no other effect
except to increase the tragic color of the film . Said to Picasso through the mouth of Modigliani's lover Jane: You can't compare to Modigliani. It's not convincing either, it's just self-deception with a huge sadness. 2 In the film, in order for someone to buy Modigliani's painting, Jane went to ask Modi's agent to let him find a way to hang a Modi painting in Picasso's exhibition, as long as one is fine. The film is filled with disdain and contempt for Picasso to show the greatness of Modigliani.
However, after so many years,
to make a biography of Modigliani, it is
still necessary to pull in the Picasso line
and enlarge this line.
In the eyes of the writer and director,
the great story of a great artist
still needs the participation of the story of another artist whom they despise, in
order to have the confidence to let more audiences watch this film.
Because people all over the world know Picasso - whether he likes and is familiar with art or not, if you
pull Picasso in,
more people will watch this film - because only a part of people who like and are familiar with art know that Diriani.
The "tragedy" that Modigliani lived in the shadow of Picasso many years ago, the writer
and director have to recreate it again.
Are you helping Modi to correct his name?
Or pour oil on the fire of tragedy.
3
from the description of the film.
I don't see how Picasso is worse than Modi.
Objectively speaking,
I don’t know how many artists lived in the shadow of Picasso at that time.
Modigliani was only one of them.
Matisse and Picasso were both “enemies” and friends. In terms
of achievements and talents,
Modi is nowhere near the heights of Mattis.
Picasso was not even afraid of Matisse, and
would never magnify a Modigliani to such a hostile level.
Therefore, Picasso, who is always revealed in the film, is jealous of Modigliani's talent,
which is simply self-inflicted obscenity.
The editor and the director wanted to photograph Picasso's jealousy of Modi,
but the result was that the final effect of Modi's jealousy and hatred of Picasso was shot everywhere.
At the beginning,
Modigliani teased Picasso in front of everyone in the bar:
Great Picasso, can you tell me how you made love to cubes.
This satirizes the cubism pioneered by Picasso.
This stroke laid the foundation for the editor and director to start the journey of pig-like teammates.
As we all know,
Cubism is a milestone in the history of art.
Using Modigliani's mouth to express a kind of ignorance and contempt for new things,
this is not only to put a hat of arrogance and ignorance on Modi,
but also to express ignorance and contempt for new things. what.
The film constantly flashes the plot of this pig-like teammate.
Really, I
tried to correct Modigliani's name but didn't make it, and
I helped a lot.
I like Modigliani and
I like Picasso.
Not so with Modigliani,
nor with Picasso.
This one has the most Samsung.
Still in the face of Modigliani.
View more about Modigliani reviews
