I also read it for the purpose of "let's see the absolute rationality of the philosophers", but after watching it for 30 minutes, I couldn't help but come over and write a comment first.
Friends with high expectations, it is best to see this as a film that is at least "semi-commercial". If you're insane too, start digging into the topics in the movie. You'll be like me and drive you crazy in 30 minutes.
After watching the film The Philosopher of Doom. The whole person is not well. It's not that this film is not good-looking, but are you sure this group is a philosopher? The screenwriter studied poetry writing, right?
When I first saw this experiment, I was very indifferent. If there is really the end of the world, and only 10 people will be left. The point should not be what is your job, but what will you be? With only 10 people left in the world.
Multiple abilities are obviously preferable to one specialization. Except for the professions like farmers and chemists that are directly related to Xiaoming. Politics, structural engineering, everything is floating clouds.
It's the end of the day, if you can dig a hole in the ground to survive, what kind of house is there to build? 10 people are still political, are you kidding me? Shall we form another House of Representatives or something? As for the one who is engaged in opera, it's the end of the day, and he still doesn't study science and technology, and he still thinks about entertainment? Is the writer American? These things can be said later.
Of course, you can also say that the purpose of extracting a specialty is to remove uncertain items for the purpose of testing. That's why I convinced myself to keep watching. Experiments are all variables, so the experiment can't go on.
But what's next? Shut out the teacher (the mysterious man). no problem. I may have my own ideas, and I won't guess if the script doesn't say it.
But what's that next? ! ! ! In the case where the teacher said he was the only one with the exit code. To keep him out because of a guess that has no theoretical or probabilistic basis? Are all these people studying screenwriting? What about logic? What about analytics? What about the probability? Was it eaten by a dog?
Let me analyze it with my little IQ, if anyone thinks I'm wrong. You are also welcome to Paizhuan or private message me on the site.
First extract the main contradiction:
1: The teacher is the only person who has the exit password.
Results: A: The teacher told a lie, in order to deceive 9 people to open the door. -> Turn 2
B: The teacher is telling the truth, and the rest will hang in the dugout a year later. -> Human Over.
2: The teacher threatened the other 9 people.
Result: C: 9 people are all destroyed, leaving one teacher
D: 9 people are destroyed and some are left.
E: The students fought back, the teacher was killed, and 9 people remained.
In short, internal conflicts will not lead to the demise of mankind. From any point of view, the human species is here to stay.
Result B is a YES/NO outcome. Either 1 or 0.
As a result, C, D, and E actually reached the same goal. It's like playing a game from the main quest to the side quest. The background of this experiment has transformed from external contradiction to internal contradiction. No matter how you take your life as a bet, it has little effect on the continuation of human beings. Unless I finally told me that the teacher was actually an undercover agent sent by the dog. . . . . So the probability of human survival under the results C, D, and E is 1.
So: Dangdang ~ return to a simple probability problem.
Choosing outcome A, the continuation probability of humans is 100%.
If you choose result B, the probability that humans will continue is 50%, and the probability that everyone will die together is 50%.
In a purely rational situation, you ask a monkey to choose, and it knows which to choose. The screenwriter didn't know. As someone said: To fight against the outside, you must first be safe inside. What's the matter with these group of philosophers not fighting the outside world and staying at home?
Personally think; the best solution to this experiment is. Vote to kick the teacher out from the start. It's the end of the world, and there are still people who are tucked away. What do you want? You thought you were Long Aotian. It's a pity that this film couldn't be filmed if it were the most real.
Friends who come with the attitude of learning philosophy can wash and sleep, or watch this as an interesting commercial film. It's nice to think about the issues inside. Anyway, don't look into it. It is impossible to convince people with the theory in it. Of course, if you just install 13, it can be another matter. =&=
View more about After the Dark reviews
