Regarding the sensitive topic of war, it is true that Hayao Miyazaki cannot be relied upon, but analyzing this is really a long story. Because so far, the Japanese have not been able to give a reliable reason why they fought the Pacific War. Iwanami Bookstore’s Lectures on the History of Japanese Diplomacy mentioned that the Great East Asia War is still debated as a “war of aggression” or a “war of aggression”. The War for East Asia's Liberation from American and British Colonization", I was like tearing up the book when I read this. In the late 1920s, various recessions caused the "Showa Panic", and Kihara Kijuro's coordinated diplomatic proposition led to the failure of the establishment of the Japan-British military alliance, which resulted in no organization to control the military expansion route of the military headquarters, and then the Manchuria Incident broke out. Japan is also looking forward to the "military boom" and various employments brought about by the war, so the public opinion is particularly supportive of the war. It was written in Kazomi Sakai's "History of Japanese Diplomacy", which is more tragic than the runaway of the military. It's a runaway of public opinion. That is to say, many Japanese have always felt that this battle was glorious, and then they were defeated, and there was a question of "who to lose to". Many parts of the war violated wartime international law, but isn't it also a violation of international law for the United States to litter the atomic bomb? Why has no one mentioned this? Sure enough, in war, the winner has the final say (I bought a watch last year). This shows that the Japanese are actually not reconciled to the war, and even aggrieved.
Japan has been proud of itself since the Sunshine War, and felt that it gave the yellow race a face. After the First World War, it even felt that it had achieved separation from Asia and joined Europe, becoming a leading Asian "civilized country" and joining the "Advanced Countries Club". However, at that time, the Asian countries still Basically colonized. Therefore, the Japanese are superior and look down on all Asian countries (as an international student, I have a deep understanding of it), and this is still the case.
In summary, what I want to say is very simple...why praise the father of the zero machine, because they do not admit their mistakes, they feel it is honorable. (perhaps
By the way, Hayao Miyazaki's animations never use professional voice actors. It seems that he calls the voice actors "voice prostitutes" (this is why I don't like him very much), which causes his animation dubbing to be non-professional, always like bluntly memorize the text. The terrible level of this kind of good reading finally reached its peak in "Feng Li ち ぬ". Anno Hideaki is a good director and a good screenwriter, but the protagonist Erlang has a facial paralysis, and he speaks quickly and without tone. In some places, he swallows the words in order to match the mouth that is about to end, which is really unbearable. Whether it's an earthquake, a fire, or a loved one's terminal illness, how can you read the lines so calmly? Well, Ghibli may want to portray Erlang as a super student who is obsessed with airplanes, but this kind of Frankenstein who lacks human feelings is from the Beijing University department, and Dongdasheng is still very normal...
PS:
About " I don’t like to look at wool”, so I was instigated by the people around me to watch it until now...
Regarding “I don’t like to go to the island country”, I used to be a crazy little pioneer in Hari, and I came to the island country for a few years and found that it was not like that at all. what's going on...
View more about The Wind Rises reviews
