. I can give a film with a particularly poor entertainment the highest score
- I think the ideological quality of literary and independent films is the first, but on the other hand, the entertainment should not be too bad, if it is so bad that Some audiences are not interested in watching it or understanding it, and only a small number of film critics and academic blind bbw, then the meaning of the film will be lost.
——This film is considered to be on the fringes. After reading other people’s film reviews, obviously many people didn’t understand it or didn’t finish it, but at least ordinary audiences like me who are not very compulsive can watch it, and that’s still acceptable.
——Actually, this movie is very similar to the dramas of the 1970s and 1980s. If this kind of story was put in that era and packaged well, it should be able to sell for money as a commercial film, but now it is no longer possible. There is only "Prisoner" (sigh, I'm so disappointed in this one.) That kind of logically complicated, but actually very simple, can be sold as a commercial film. This kind of film that really needs to be thought about can only be rushed to the Olympics.
——The reason why I compare it with "The Prisoner" is because I think the two films are trying to express similar things. The characters of Jennifer Lawrence and Hugh Jackman both adhere to some good things in a biased value system. Quality people (although the stories vary a lot), but I have no doubt that Winter's Bone is too much stronger.
Let me talk about a few things that make me feel emotional:
1. The heroine actually has no value judgment on gangsters. That is her upbringing environment. Would you question what all your elders are doing? The rebellion she showed was forced, and more because women were in an extremely disadvantaged position in that system. If she were male, like her brother was a little older, there might not have been that kind of resistance.
——Proving once again that women are the important driving force for the great changes in the troubled times Regardless, it's still inspiring.
3. The women in the gang, especially the one who beat the heroine, always thought she was bad in the first half. Later, when she took the heroine to fish for her father's bones, she suddenly felt that she couldn't be considered a bad person. That's the way people in that small society think about problems, and women are instrumentalized.
4. The cops in this story are actually unreliable and may have colluded with gangsters. I believe that all the adults in this story are very aware of what happened from the very beginning. Even if the police did not have a mole, at least they did not do their duty to protect the informant, and they did not pay attention to what happened to the informant's family. The government was too inaction. - So, don't wonder why the heroine didn't ask the official for help.
5. The heroine's uncle did play an important role in the final result. Without the support of this adult man, the girls in this family would basically die. There's a scene in the middle where he goes to "find the real murderer", and at the end he says he knows who the real murderer is - these scenes actually make me a little bit puzzled. Maybe I'm too pessimistic about human nature. I think the heroine's father should have been tried and executed by a gangster. It's impossible for her uncle to not know who the murderer is, and it may even be his own hands. He helped the heroine not only out of family affection, but also because of conscience... Am I too dark? ...this story has the original novel, I don't know how it was written in the original
View more about Winter's Bone reviews
