Dedicated to PTA: Genius teenagers grow up

Julius 2021-10-13 13:05:35

The once genius boy PTA has grown up. People who like his movies call him PTA, not Paul Thomas Anderson. At the age of 37, this weak, crooked, unshaven, and muddy boy from the past genius took out the fifth work slowly and lazily. He is no longer a boy now, and he is not even a "young director". It applies to him, but he still scared me a big jump-in the first 20 minutes, starting with a mass-type swing arm, constantly digging, constantly suffering from work injuries, and constantly pumping blood and oil on the camera (from I can finally see here that he is usually the guy who mingled with Quentin Tarantino's gang of gangsters), without a word, completely lost the PTA's past four or five lines of muttering each other, but it is very eloquent. The background is clearly explained.

It has become more of a narrative structure. The loose and parallelism of the past is gone. The textbook-like Epic mode, the protagonist is bright, and even the supporting role, strictly speaking, there are only two, one of which (that is, the fake brother) hardly needs to perform. . And this time, PTA didn’t want to spend any effort to explain the miscellaneous roles. It’s not that he didn’t have the patience. You know, the foundation of PTA’s family is the creation of group portraits, so many people say that the Achilles’ heel of "TWBB" It’s a one-man show, I think it’s totally irresponsible nonsense-just imagine if the people in this film are like "Magnolia" and have endless troubles, or like "No Country For" "Old Men" is the same as each show off, how do you look at this scene?

In addition, maybe everyone seems to be particularly obsessed with Daniel Day-Lewis. In many people's film reviews, he can't see anything except him. How good Paul Dano’s performance is, maybe a little too much force, but the premise of this film is to work hard collectively, slightly surpassing realism, which is also the style of PTA.

Some people also say that Jonny Greenwood's soundtrack for "TWBB" is a mystery and a noisy soundtrack. I really can't hear the mystery, but it is very appropriate to the story, and it is really a soundtrack written for the movie. It’s even more nonsense to be overwhelmed by the noise. The two most exaggerated and anti-traditional sections are the burning of the derrick and the knocking of the tubing. But who will be distracted by these two? ! As JG's first official film soundtrack (the previous "Bodysong" can only be counted as a ticket), the starting point is really high. At least it can be seen from this album that his grasp of string music is becoming more and more mature. Perhaps, this little handyman who once entered Radiohead under "begging" will take a broader road in the future.

The most people say is that PTA has begun to say goodbye to the past. All right. If you say so, isn't he saying goodbye all the time? He has never photographed the same thing. I haven't seen his debut work "Sydney", but how much do the four subsequent works have in common with each other? But these are all PTAs, a passionate young man who likes Altman and Scorsese, likes Westerns, likes Los Angeles, likes to read, and likes to write. Finally, after more than ten years of being indecent, and playing in the movie circle for so long wearing the hat of "bad youth", he began to pay tribute to high-quality movies. But those who think that he will embrace mainstream movies and start to march towards the "temple" don't have to worry about it, he is not that kind of person at all. Maybe, tomorrow he will continue to tinker with a neuropathy film, like "Punch Drunk Love". If he has his persistence, it is "good-looking". Try to look as good as possible, and it doesn't matter if you use everything you learn from others.

Some people say that "TWBB" is not as deep as "No Country". Perhaps this is the most ridiculous comment-what is depth? Can it be measured with a ruler? One discusses the social changes and the world’s deteriorating situation, the old people cannot understand the new people’s melancholy and sorrow; the other discusses the struggle between greed and morality, the accumulation of capital and the cleansing of religion, as well as the complex and huge oil extraction in the United States. history. Excuse me, which is the depth and which is shallow?

"TWBB" is a movie that really tests the director's skills-precisely because there are few characters, the story is linear, and at the same time relatively loose. How to tell one era, or even the changes of several eras, with just one person is really a challenge for directors like PTA who didn't have many works in the past.

As far as PTA is concerned, "TWBB" is definitely a great masterpiece, but the point is that this movie tells us that his future is even more limitless. When he filmed Boogie Nights 10 years ago, who could have expected that even Altman himself would give him the responsibility of completing the last work on his behalf before he died. Altman once predicted that "TWBB" would be a masterpiece, but unfortunately, he didn't even catch a glance at the rough cut version. As a result, PTA dedicated "TWBB" to Altman. The elderly should be very pleased. At least, before "TWBB", I had doubted whether PTA had the ability to become a master in addition to borrowing and chaos. Now, I have no doubt that if there will be a master among the filmmakers born in the 70s, It must be him.

Two additional sentences:
If you want to say that this movie has a flaw, I think the first thing is Daniel Day-Lewis, he is too famous, too deeply rooted, and mistakenly attracted too many Day-Lewis’s personal fans to watch this film. Then evaluate the film-however, this film is not the cup of tea for these people.


Finally:
This is a movie that makes people speechless for a long time after watching it. I didn’t want to write a review. I was afraid that I would be too subjective and that I could hardly say a word. The so-called "responsible" comment can't help but post some trivial arguments.

View more about There Will Be Blood reviews

Extended Reading
  • Rocio 2021-10-20 18:59:30

    After reading it, I feel like a pile of shit. There are so many geniuses in the world. Why should I go to school?

  • Madisyn 2022-03-22 09:01:05

    Whether it is this or The Master, PTA has completely established its own style in shaping the characters: non-dramatic, sharp, multi-dimensional, and amazing. And the male protagonists of the two movies are templates that can be called "what is real acting?"

There Will Be Blood quotes

  • Plainview: Mr. Bankside, I'm not going to waste your time; I'd certainly appreciate it if you didn't waste mine. Now, if you wish to sign with me, we can have a well drilling within ten days, but your lot is further north from the discovery well up here, and so... Well, that means we'll probably have to dig deeper. And if there's as much oil here as I think there is, it'll be harder to reach, but once we find it, we can take it right out. You have to act quickly, because very soon these fields will be dry. Now... I need you to know what you want to do. Now, because of the distance from the discovery well, I'll pay you a smaller royalty than you'd get down there, but I'm prepared to give you a thousand dollar bonus on your lot.

    Mr. Bankside: What kind of royalty are you talking about?

    Plainview: 1/6th, plus a guarantee to start drilling within ten days. Now, that's something you won't find anywhere else.

    [long silence]

    Plainview: What age your children, ma'am?

    Mrs. Bankside: 10 and 12. Mr. Plainview, a question, sir. Where is your wife?

    Plainview: She died in childbirth, Mrs. Bankside, so I... so... Well, it's just me and my son now.

  • Paul Sunday: Mr. Plainview?

    Plainview: Yes?

    Paul Sunday: Are you Daniel Plainview?

    Plainview: Yes. What can I do for you?

    Paul Sunday: You look for oil.

    Plainview: That's right.

    Paul Sunday: What do you pay for a place that has it?

    Plainview: Well, that depends.

    Paul Sunday: What does it depend on?

    Plainview: On a lot of things.

    Paul Sunday: If I told you I knew a place that had oil, where land could be bought cheaply, what do you think that would be worth?

    Plainview: Oh, I think that, uh... you should let me know what you know, and, uh, and then we'll try and work something out.

    Paul Sunday: Can I sit down?

    Plainview: Please.

    Paul Sunday: [Paul sits] What church do you belong to?

    Plainview: I, um... I enjoy all faiths. I don't belong to one church in particular. I... I like them all. I like everything. Where are you from?

    Paul Sunday: That would be telling you. That's what I want to sell you.

    Plainview: What are you doing in Signal Hill?

    Paul Sunday: We have oil and it seeps through the ground. Do you want to pay me to know where it is...

    Plainview: Well, just because there's something on the ground doesn't mean there's anything beneath it.

    Paul Sunday: Why did Standard Oil buy up land?

    Plainview: Is it in California?

    Paul Sunday: Maybe.

    Plainview: How much land they buy?

    Paul Sunday: I'd like it better if you didn't think I was stupid.