The movie sets three multiple-choice questions, three choices, and three different endings. The most interesting thing is that after the three sessions, the teachers' desks are also placed differently, from scattered, to parallel, and finally to surround, this is the explanation What's up? Do people need solidarity to survive? Or cooperating with each other is the key to survival.
Regarding this shelter, this is the first time I found in a movie the most rudimentary one of the human doomsday shelters. The door is protected from radiation by a glass door, and then it is not a basement, but the kind that has sunlight coming in. High-tech sanctuary, beyond the scope of my imagination, and then about the film in philosophy, what is he going to show?
A teacher who always controls the life and death of others, playing the role of this God? A group of ordinary people play different occupations in reality. Doesn't Western philosophy advocate equality for all? Why does the final philosophy have to distinguish between high and low people? This time the distinction is relatively high-level, from the most primitive family and blood in the original ecology to the comprehensive choice in this movie. If one of these people encounters a choice, fear What to do with the patient? Are you doomed to be the first out? Is it not the poet who always gets shot?
The ending of the movie is so bizarre, it has surpassed the imagination. When I closed the door, I thought I was going to re-examine the process of integrating the plural side selection, but it turned out... This teacher's heart has also grown, and the face He is so calm about his rival, no wonder the director finally set the ending to look like that...
Addition: Probability is a bright spot. And then one guy is a good idea for six girls.....
View more about After the Dark reviews
